English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

22 answers

Because she does not want american citizens to make money. She wants to have full control of how much money one can make a year. She is only interested in the people when it benifits her. She is a racist hence the racial comment in 1974 about Bill Clintons campaign manager when he lost. She changes with the weather in her opinions she only goes with what will get her the vote.... basically she has no backbone. Oh she doesnt have a problem with illegal immigration.

"She's the most unbelievable actress I have ever met," said a woman who worked on Hillary's Senate campaign. "I remember one time at a Women's Leadership Forum event in New York, thirty of us sat around Hillary, talking about politics. And she said, 'You know, I love this organization, not just because we sit around and talk about politics, but because of the bonds of friendship forming around us.' The way she said it, people were riveted by her performance. But I had gotten to know her, and I could tell she didn't mean it. She has this unbelievable ability to be a liar. She is soulless."

EDWARD KLEIN

She stayed with a husband who has been accused of a rape admitted cheater but yet she still stands by him.

2007-03-21 18:19:47 · answer #1 · answered by Barack O Bankrupt 4 · 5 3

The Republicans are knocking not only Ms. Clinton, but any potential Democratic candidate.

The Republicans know that the people are tired of keeping the status quo, and want changes to their govenment and policies.

In fact, the conservaive wing of the Republican party is even knocking McCain and Guiliani, two of the more centrist party members.

In answering your second question, I do not believe that Ms. Clinton can do as bad a job as President G.W. Bush because she is an intelligent lady, knowing that her performance in office shall impact her party being able to stay in control of Congress.

Further, the Clintons were very well-thought of, internationally.

2007-03-21 18:56:01 · answer #2 · answered by MenifeeManiac 7 · 1 0

i don't think people are afraid because most know it will not happen. But look at what would happen to this country if she did.. higher taxes, universal everything, a do what you want without consequence attitude, the government would become more intrusive in your life, national security would go to heck, we would be speaking spanish, and we would all be driving hybrids and spending money on all these little things to help the environment which don't make a difference.

2007-03-21 19:32:32 · answer #3 · answered by aaron b 4 · 0 0

She is as bad as Bush, except she is also a communist.

Here is here comment on her energy policy:

"I Turn Off A Light And Say, 'Take That, Iran,' And 'Take That, Venezuela.' We Should Not Be Sending Our Money To People Who Are Not Going To Support Our Values."

-The Associated Press, 3/19/07

2007-03-21 18:26:51 · answer #4 · answered by uab_skinhead 3 · 3 1

The right needs a boogieman or women. That person is currently Hillary. Many don't even know why they specifically hate her so much. They just do because they've been told to hate her. She's actually pretty conservative/moderate. She was raised a conservative Republican after all.

2007-03-21 18:44:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If Hillary Clinton became President she might actually be able to use her years of insider experience to actually get something done. Can you imagine how threatening that is to other politicians?

Politics is all about power and influence, and the big thing is that when you use them effectively both increase. Therefore, the effect of a successful initiative is to increase your power relative to those who did nothing.

Naturally, those who do nothing will do almost anything to prevent that from happening. Inertia works in their political favour, and those who threaten the balance of things draw the fiercest heat and most deliberate attacks.

Hillary Clinton is a veteran of these wars. She watched the first Clinton Presidency derailed by partisan investigations and attacks that did not stop after the courts had determined the facts. Has ever a wronged woman been so vilified herself?

The Senator is drawing the same heat again, because she scares the professional politicians whose living depends on business as usual. Who fears her?

Big pharmacy will donate lots of money to her opponents, both in the primaries and in November 2008. So will the HMOs, and all the other corporations that profit from private health care. They fear what her agenda will do to their profits.

It is said that to solve a crime you should ask who benefits. In this case, ask who loses, and there is your answer.

2007-03-21 18:26:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

Because under Hilarythe US will become a third world country.
Huge inflation, huge taxes, the total decimation of borders, language and culture. Bush is a beginner compared to what she can do. Bush is an idiot but Hilary is a clever idiot.

2007-03-21 18:20:25 · answer #7 · answered by kwilfort 7 · 5 1

Why would we want to go back to appeasement policies? Do you really want to cut our military and intelligence budgets again? Didn't work so well the last time. Plus there's the whole poll-chasing thing....until the American people pay more attention to politics than to Britney or Anna-Nicole, I don't *WANT* a govt that chases those people. I realize minds can change over time, but Hillary is just a poll ho.

Besides, I don't want to be taxed out of existence, and I really believe the Democrats will do that.

2007-03-21 18:33:00 · answer #8 · answered by Jadis 6 · 1 3

Oh well, where do I start. First, she is a socialist. As far as I am concerned, all of the Democrats want are to stick their noses in all aspects of our lives.
She wants to take away our money. She evidently believes it is a crime to have money. When 95% of the taxes paid in America are coming from the top 2% of the tax payers, something is wrong. And all they want to do is extract more.
They want to control our lives. Democrats want to take the rights of parents away and allow the government to "protect" our kids rights.
They care more about the rights of a whale than they do about the rights of an unborn child.
They care more about the rights of child molesters than they do the rights of our children.
If you ask me -- and you did -- she can be A LOT WORSE than Bush. And that makes me VERY AFRAID!

2007-03-21 18:21:50 · answer #9 · answered by brevboy 2 · 4 2

For the same reason Giuliani would be even worse than Bush: evil + competency = hopeless. At least Bush's idiocy tempers his effectiveness as a tyrant.

2007-03-21 18:26:52 · answer #10 · answered by brad_spangler 2 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers