English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

Well, first of all sin(x) is bounded between -1 and 1. Which means that sin(x)^2 is always between zero and one.

Therefore your series can be compared with 1/n sqrt(n).

Notice that 1/n sqrt(n) is always bigger than or equal to to sin(x)^2/n sqrt(n).

The sum 1/n sqrt(n) converges because of the p-series test.

Therefore your original series also converges.

2007-03-21 18:38:58 · answer #1 · answered by The Prince 6 · 0 0

The sin^2 x part doesn't matter since it's independent of n, thus you only need to consider whether the sum of 1/(n sqrt n) converges. This is the same as 1/n^{3/2}. As you may know the sum of 1/n^p converges when p>1. You can see this by considering the integral

\int_1^infty 1/n^p dn = 1/(p-1).

2007-03-22 01:26:50 · answer #2 · answered by Sean H 5 · 0 0

Note that sin² x is constant w.r.t. n, so [n=1, ∞]∑sin² x/(n√n) = sin² x [n=1, ∞]∑1/(n√n), which, like all series of the form [n=1, ∞]∑1/(n^s) with s>1, converges. (You may prove this with the integral test -- 1/n^s is monotone decreasing, so [n=1, ∞]∑1/n^s converges if [1, ∞]∫1/x^s dx does. But for s>1, 1-s<0, so [1, ∞]∫1/x^s dx = [1, ∞]∫x^(-s) dx = x^(1-s)/(1-s) | [1, ∞] = [h→∞]lim h^(1-s)/(1-s) - 1^(1-s)/(1-s) = 1/(s-1)).

2007-03-22 01:22:12 · answer #3 · answered by Pascal 7 · 0 0

Well since (sin(x))^2 oscillates between -1 and 1, and (n(sqrt(n))) is equivalent to n^(3/2) which grows rapidly as n-> oo, 1/oo=0.

2007-03-22 01:20:22 · answer #4 · answered by the_really_good_son 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers