as it is the two political parties (R) & (D) have very little to offer the real people of the U.S., they are mostly corp. pigs and heirs to old money who are seeking a way to loophole a way out of being taxed. I think we neeg to grab them by the ankles and shake'm until their gold crowns fall out, and if they think war is nessesary arm them to the teeth and let them go for it.
2007-03-21 17:02:46 · 29 answers · asked by Allen G I 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What you are describing is not a Civil War, it is a Revolution.
2007-03-21 17:07:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah , but i believe that it may have more than 2 sides to it, and americans wont be fighting other americans,rather fighting many groups or countries. I'm certain that our lack of involvement in the politics going on now, and the ignorance that our rights have already been taken from most of us, is the reason we'll fall to the numerous countries who have planned this to happen . We are not the u.s.a. anymore and theres only us to blame . Our fight was lost a few years ago, and we now can only prepare for the fight to survive . we will be hunted , and slaved by the masses as we will see our families raped killed and torchured, we might unite then, but far too late
2007-03-22 00:28:58 · answer #2 · answered by rick s 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There's nothing to fight over. As you said it, the corporations and to a larger degree, SPECIAL INTERESTS own the government on BOTH sides of the aisle. Where would the borders of such a war be? There are none, so there will be no civil war. Plus, most Americans (myself included) are too big of panties to fight a civil war.
2007-03-22 00:07:12 · answer #3 · answered by Wocka wocka 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on how large the crowd of dumbfvcks that'll back the corporate hegemony will be. It might be a very short civil war if it's just We the People vs. the elite, policitians, bankers, etc..
2007-03-22 00:06:34 · answer #4 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
A civil war I dont think so but if there is anything warlike I would guess it would be an outbreak in the southwest of the USA of vigilantism due to the escalating illegal immigration issues and politicians not addressing them.
2007-03-22 00:07:13 · answer #5 · answered by sociald 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Good God, I hear the "Internationale" playing in the background of your post. Workers of the world, unite!...and all that nonsense.
Marxism was a bad idea when we beat you people in the Cold War, what makes you think it's a better idea now?
2007-03-22 00:10:05 · answer #6 · answered by Rick N 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't agree with all of your additional detail stuff. But the answer to your question is: YES.
Today there are very strong moral differences between two very distinct mind-sets.
Will there actually BE a war? I don't know. But your question was if we are heading in that direction.
Yes, we are heading in that direction, most definitely.
2007-03-22 00:11:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
who would fight for the blue states? homosexuals and hippies? they could come up with a hardcore group of elite feminazis, but other than that, they wouldn't stand much of a chance. i grew up in the northeast and heck, everyone knows they dont even have the factories and industrialization that they did during the first civil war. god help them.
2007-03-22 00:17:54 · answer #8 · answered by Matt 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Won't require a civil war for what you're talking about....50,000 vigilante soldiers, set on" permanent "change ,could accomplish a huge amount in a very short time.though......
2007-03-22 00:11:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt it. I think now if the American people were dumb enough to do such a thing every terrorist and his mother would exploit the situation.I admit things seem a bit crazy but there is no need for war.Things can only get better.
2007-03-22 00:27:45 · answer #10 · answered by Chosen 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋