I would go with Tyson Chandler because he hasn't reached his potential yet and Ben Wallace has however Chicago's offense isn't a good setting for any big man. They don't feed you the ball and they don't run plays
2007-03-22 05:29:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Blake O 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ben Wallace
2007-03-21 23:49:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by maivas229 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ben Wallace. Hands down.
2007-03-21 23:45:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Hello11 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would get tyson chandler because i am a warriors fan. Don nelson is a good coach and he could train him to be an offensive player. Ben wallace lost his fire
2007-03-22 00:26:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by rushkgkerawala29 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Right now, Chandler, He's still young. Wallace is cool, but I like to bet on the future.
2007-03-22 00:19:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by G R 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
bang for your buck............tyson chandler. he's still young and coming into his game. ben is over 30 and he's paid way too much for what he does. chandler will only get better, and he had the ability to score. ben will be lucky to average 9 points a game for a season.
2007-03-22 12:31:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
tyson chandler, because he has his offensive games, wallace rarley has an offensive game the whole season!
2007-03-21 23:47:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anthony xD 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
ignoring their contracts, id take wallace. i think he is a better defender and shot blocker. both are good at rebounding, but i think wallace is a little better.
2007-03-21 23:42:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by what? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
ben wallace
2007-03-22 13:13:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by west coast gal 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chandler is a better scorer and rebounder, so I would go with him.
2007-03-22 00:02:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by cavsfan2004 2
·
0⤊
0⤋