I have noticed that liberals seem to huddle around and just talt to eachother about how right they all are. But you throw a conservative in there to ask some questions about why they believe what they believe, and all heck breaks loose, what happens, is that the conservative gets exploited and called stupid and ignorant for not agreeing exactly with what the majority believes, and then they go ahead and tell us that we dont like to be questioned on our beliefs because we have no viable evidence on why we believe them. What is wrong with this picture?
2007-03-21 16:13:22 · 17 answers · asked by ChainGangPrincess 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
whoops, i meant Talk, not talt, but im sure that you liberals are sure that im just too dumb to know what im talking about, so your not surprised that i made a couple of gramatical errors. oopsy!
2007-03-21 16:19:23 · update #1
Thank you MR Zenrage for proving my point to a T, i couldnt have come up with a better scenario than the one you just gave me. Thank you so much for helping me realize how right i really am....
2007-03-21 16:22:21 · update #2
Actually Andy P, i detest both beer and NASCAR, but i do love books. And i thought i was among the mainstream conservatives!
2007-03-21 16:24:19 · update #3
There is a common denominator among cons...all their questions are about liberals. Are you stalking me?
2007-03-21 16:16:34 · answer #1 · answered by CC 6 · 3⤊ 5⤋
I have noticed that conservatives seem to huddle around and just talt to eachother about how right they all are. But you throw a liberal in there to ask some questions about why they believe what they believe, and all heck breaks loose, what happens, is that the liberal gets exploited and called stupid and ignorant for not agreeing exactly with what the majority believes, and then they go ahead and tell us that we dont like to be questioned on our beliefs because we have no viable evidence on why we believe them.
So we have something in common.
2007-03-21 16:20:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
What they all have in common is that bleeding heart mentality that thinks terrorists who do not wear uniforms and attempt to or succeed in killing our brave women and men in combat deserve to have a lawyer and a trial instead of being summarily executed. Another thing they have in common is hypocrisy. Just consider Al Gore who tried to sue his way into the White House. Every minute he's not speaking about global warming he's either flying around in some fuel inefficient jet polluting the atmosphere and destroying the ozone layer, running up a $1200 electric bill every month in his 26 acre mansion or driving some large gas guzzling car.
2007-03-21 16:23:27 · answer #3 · answered by cartiphilus 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Please hasten to a reliable dictionary. A "liberal "is simply defined as "One who is generous of spirit." It is not the new "N" word. What you seem to be describing is a group of people who demand concrete answers to your abstract theories. If you can't handle that? Just opt for more time on your Xbox.
Sorry, don't mean to be snide. I wish you knew better than to foam at the mind when a rabies vaccine would fix you right up. I'm trying to be generous of spirit but it just doesn't take with some folks.
2007-03-21 16:26:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Interesting observation.
I tried recently to debate with a liberal - it's damn near impossible. None of my points were addressed, none of my questions were answered and I kept getting the same replies.
It seems he just kept repeating his beliefs and conclusions - like they were valid facts instead of just his opinion. It's hard to have a one sided debate when no matter what you ask - the question is ignored, and, instead, followed up with just a repetition of what he has already pointed out - numerous times.
2007-03-21 16:28:55 · answer #5 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the elementary denominator between maximum religions is an attempt to attain as much as the eternal, to discover long existence or fulfilment or perfection. whether there is one that is distinctive. Christianity (and Judaism coated to three volume) differs in that it tells the story of ways God reaches right down to humanity, with the intention to repair mankind's fellowship with God!
2016-10-19 07:41:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess that could be true with you, but I know my Conservative and Liberal friends like discussing with each other. It makes for a more exciting and worth while debate.
2007-03-21 16:18:04 · answer #7 · answered by Sam K 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
As a liberal, I'm sorry if that's happened to you. I don't think conservatives are stupid. But I do think that people shouldn't be afraid to examine their opinions in the light of the available evidence.
2007-03-21 16:21:15 · answer #8 · answered by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Of course in your mind conservatives are perfect little angels. Yeah right. Both sides are guilty and you know it.
2007-03-21 16:28:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um, I don't think that the scenario you described is limited to liberals only. It's called the human condition. People befriend those who share their views and ignore information that contradicts those views. We all do it.
It's just that liberals do it after reading books and getting advanced degrees whereas people like you do it after drinking grain alcohol and watching NASCAR.
2007-03-21 16:18:53 · answer #10 · answered by Andy P 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
They seem to have no beliefs except the belief in the anti-war movement....beyond that it is the same Democratic party that has been lost for over 12 years... No direction, no new idea...
They would have us believe the world will be great once we leave Iraq....hmmm but no ideas on how to do it
2007-03-21 16:18:10 · answer #11 · answered by Johnny Mek 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋