Clinton's would be the best thing that would happen to the U.S since Kennedy.
2007-03-21 15:59:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jean f 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
Since the VP must Constitutionally be eligible to become President, Bill could not run. However, I full support a tiket that includes George Clinton of P-Funk.
2007-03-21 16:43:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by JerH1 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'd quite have a president stoop over the rostrum than bow to an Arab king. And the considerable failure of which you talk belongs to Congress, the democrats, and the RINOs after S&*t for brains liberal democrooks took over congress. it is been down hill ever in view that. Deny this all you prefer, yet sensible, unfastened questioning human beings see in the process the hype and the lies. Pity, extremely, the little Barry lemmings by no ability will.
2016-12-15 05:57:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by cheng 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
we have had either a Bush or a Clinton in the white house since 1988. counting GB as VP, since 1981. 2 more years in GWB's term. that will make 28 straight years with either a bush or a clinton. it's time to change.
2007-03-21 16:00:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Bill cannot serve as VP. The two term rule does apply and the qualifications for VP are the same as they are for President, by the 22nd Amendment.
2007-03-21 16:22:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
He 's already been Hilary's Vice President for 2 terms.
2007-03-21 15:57:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by howard h 2
·
5⤊
1⤋
No, The only worse ticket would be a Clinton/Carter!
2007-03-21 16:02:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I am not an american but a husband and wife tandem especially when its for the highest position is unimaginable. Just think of it one would certainly influence the other.
2007-03-21 16:26:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by kibbs 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would be illegal. If Bill was vice president he could ascend to the presidency. Because he can no longer be president he can't be vice president.
2007-03-21 16:04:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
no the clintons was in the oral office for 8 years so we need someone in office that will actually get something done!
2007-03-21 16:05:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Billy S 6
·
0⤊
0⤋