hells yes. I just wish Cillian Murphy was in it.
2007-03-21 15:52:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ok, is no one concerned that Danny Boyle isn't affiliated with the sequel as director?
28 Days Later was a brillant take on the issue of a viral plague, whether or not we would respond if it was isolated to a geographic area, such as an island, and how survivors would treat each other in its aftermath. I caught only a glimpse of it on cable and the next day, I purchased the DVD. The director has a great deal to do with the film and its vision. I am worried it will lose a lot without Danny, producer doesn't count.
I am however looking forward to Sunshine.
2007-03-21 16:11:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by KT Richter 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
It sounds so good.
Here's the plot summary for those who dont know about it.
The film starts six months after the Rage virus has spread throughout the city of London. The United States Army has restored order and is repopulating the quarantined city, when a carrier of the Rage virus enters London and unknowingly re-ignites the spread of the deadly infection, wreaking havoc on the entire population.
The Release Date is suppose to be May 11, 2007
2007-03-21 15:52:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by sexylittlemisstweetybird83 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
no. Avatar wasn't even that reliable. this is specific effects and cinematography have been a mixture of each and every thing that has been performed over the final decade prepare in a single equipment. That equipment became brilliantly created and looked breathtaking, yet, certainly, i don't think of it became that unique. It merely confirmed what might nicely be performed now and the thank you to do it. there will be yet another movie come out interior the subsequent ten years which places it to shame, i can guarentee that.
2016-11-27 21:06:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've not heard of this yet. That's cool--I liked 28 Days Later, even though it scared the bajeevies out of me. Made you think...and sweat.
2007-03-21 15:53:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What a shame. The original was so good, it does not need a stupid sequel. I probably won't see it, I was satisfied with the ending to the first.
2007-03-21 15:58:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by jaymes_07 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is a GREAT storyline, so looking forward to the second. I just hope it doesn't fall into the bad sequel bin
2007-03-21 16:18:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bella-El 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I am so there on opening night! I always say the Americans come in and nuke Britain after the closing credits. Now we'll actually see it, cause you know we (yes, I'm American) would so do that.
2007-03-21 22:39:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Save Nathan Petrelli 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Sure always up for a good movie..I kinda like all the Natural disaster movies! You know Twisters, hurricanes, Earthquakes, Black Death ect ect
2007-03-21 15:58:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Alea 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
Not really the first one was bland give it more plot seriously phone up your contacts and tell them i said that!
2007-03-21 15:52:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋