http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070320103344AAyG5nK&r=w&pa=FZptHWf.BGRX3OFMhjBQUr1grHAALfPqLXu5ApxWQFJAxeoMoyX44RDRSCa9dg5dAExG9pN5VVLaAIR41Q--&paid=answered#TZArXzPpVWIDMoDamYLx2pjkrqbMdQqVK9tdtuLd7iGCPz1PyN0i
2007-03-21 15:14:40 · 16 answers · asked by TRUE PATRIOT 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think the fact that her question posted in the Elections forum instead of the Science forum speaks for itself.
2007-03-21 15:18:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
the only places climate exchange remains "hotly debated" is in venues which includes this and between those with the letters JD in the back of their names, not PH.D.! the huge majority of this u . s .'s scientific minds who easily analyze this occasion and those proper are unequivocal of their shown fact that climate exchange exists and is inspired via human interest. who're you going to have faith- those human beings or people who purely mouth off because of the fact that is not handy for them to stand changing their existence type possibly? if your baby is ill & has a severe fever, yet you do not have faith that a virulent disease is the reason on account which you won't be able to see it or comprehend the thought, might you nevertheless purely permit the youngster lay there and don't something yet shake a stick at it, or might you look for the attention of an knowledgeable scientific expert? that's not a count of religion! I artwork with DNA which few human beings see, yet few might deny exists. My chum is a non secular educator and works with some thing i won't be able to see and quite frankly am skeptical approximately, quite if i exploit the yardstick of people who ridicule international warming!! have you ever heard of a family individuals that permit a infant die because of the fact they did not have faith in docs and had to scream at them via the television? i think the comparable in the direction of climate exchange naysayers. I artwork interior the sphere of scientific analyze and have confidence the scientific community usual. however the naysayers denial of evolution, DNA, quarks, and so on does not inevitably imperil the planet, our destiny AND their own young toddlers' and grandkids' destiny, as much as denial of this situation threatens to. McCain isn't my selection yet neither is he a scientifically illiterate boob interestingly!!!
2016-10-19 07:37:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hilary will jump on any band wagon, if it will get her elected.
2007-03-21 16:10:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
She say Al-manbearpig-Gore in DC giving testimony and she panicked. One more man trying to keep her down and steal from her what she believes is rightfully hers The Whitehouse.
2007-03-21 15:39:53 · answer #4 · answered by Mother 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
To get a vote a politician will join any cause. Just watch 'em.
2007-03-21 15:18:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Everybody who agrees with this situation at one time or another "jumped" on the band wagon.
Everybody didn't "jump" at the same time....it's her turn.
2007-03-21 15:18:35 · answer #6 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Hillary is like a magnet to whatever seems to be attracting attention. What she believes for herself is anyone's guess...
2007-03-21 15:18:34 · answer #7 · answered by Apachecat 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Oh, that's so very simple to explain.. . . . .Answer : Because it seems to be popular at the moment !!
Thank you, now I'll take 'Democratic Gypsies, Tramps, and Thieves' for $1000 please, Alex !!
2007-03-21 23:20:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
She stuck her finger in the air to check which way the liberal wind was blowing.
2007-03-21 15:18:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Some people are more swayed by scientific data than by the preacher man,...I would guess, and she apparently is one of those people
2007-03-21 15:20:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋