How can you possibly believe that WTC 7 collapsed due to diesel fuel?

Question

If you believe that it is true please give me a reason you believe such utter nonsense and please check back because i will be resonding to answers. Remember WTC 7 was never hit by a plane.

ML- Ok, if you watch the video you can see explosions running up the side of the buildings a second before the collapse. Also notice that there is a kink at the roof which is always present during a contolled demolition. The kink is caused by the core support columns being "pulled" This is what leaseholder Silverstien was refering to when he admitted that the building was pulled, so it is even admitted to. Demolition experts all over the world say that it is the only possoble explanation. Remember the building fell at free fall speed there was no resistance whatsoever- how could this be? The fire explanation cannot be possible becase all accounts show that the fires in the building were random. So how could 24 core supports weaken simultaneously? Would you not suspect an asymetrical collapse? Why are other more probable hypothesis looked at? Now if you could please give me analysis on why you think the building collapsed becase of fire. Remember that not steel framed building had-

fr chuck- do you have any evidence of anything you say. ps. i belive the twin towers were brought down by a controlled demolition as well, but you seriously need to do some research if you think that more that 1% of 9/11 conspiracy theorists believe that planes did not hit the buildings.

Ok, how does calling me an idiot answer the question? Most of you simply have no idea what you are talking about so you reosrt to ad homenin attacks which only give creedence to alternative theories, so thanks I can see right through your tactics which are not backed by any factual evidence.

Scronce- 9/11 truth has nothing to do with a socialist movement- you would know that if you had done any research. By the way you did not even attempt to answer my question which shows you know not what you speak. If you want to sound intelligent, which you obviously are not you might want to try answering the question.

Answer 1

Nobody who believes the official story of 9/11 will say that wtc7 was blown up because then they would have to take a better look at the twin towers coming down. The planes hitting the towers isn't really what made people in awe,it was crazy,but when they collapsed that's what was most devastating. Most people on either side already have their minds made up,the only difference is we know both sides,and they wont listen to a second of it.

Answer 2

You know I can't give you scientific evidence to corroborate either side, but I would like to see some credible evidence from your perspective as well. I will also say that yes, some of the WTC 7 stuff sounds sketchy, but I still don't follow conspiracy theories..

I will, however, say that I was on Church St. that day. I saw the fireball go down the street, outran the collapse (you can even see two of my coworkers on the video that was shot by the French cameramen). There was a tremendous amount of force that brought down the towers to the point where sysmic activity was recorded from the event as far away as Maine.

I will also say, as Noam Chomsky has said, that a consipiracy as big as this would not be kept secret this long. Somone would have had to leaked at this point. Look at Watergate and Deepthroat. That wasn't even as close to the same size and it came out right away.

Answer 3

Think about it, Two very large, very heavy buildings come crashing down, sending seismic waves miles away. A much smaller and lighter building was right next to the two towers. I think that debris would do quite a bit of damage alone, add the shock wave from the towers and the already unstable building would collapse. It is quite simple really, but since you won't listen to reasoning, I may have just wasted sometime but gained 2 points.

Answer 4

Frist building 7 was not one of the twin towers and I would assume you do beleive that both of the actual towers were brought down by the planes where so many of our friends and families died in the planes, I do so hate the people that try to lie and say planes did not actually crash, because so many lost loved ones on those planes.

Building 7 as not enough people know was a building in the complex area, it did suffer seroius damage from the crashes along with loss of all power and damage to any and all back up power systems.

This building also housed a special government "Bunker" which was also fairly well commom knowledge but not talked about. And the building also housed alot of government storage ( of unknown materical)

If that building was perhaps rigged in case of enemy take over or some other issue, it could have went down automaticly because of the serious damage to security, or it may have been bought down because of possible leak of material stored there, or to destroy secure material in the bunker. That real reason will never be known.

But although not hit by the plane, the damage to that building from the falling of the other buildings was fairly seroius

Answer 5

Another great one Luke. It is so sad that the skeptics keep demanding evidence and whistle blowers, all the while you're trying to give them evidence and reference the whistle blowers. The facts are there, but people prefer blissful ignorance.

One thing that is just so sad is that so many people are like, "A guy confessed, so case closed. He did it." Yeah guys, you're right. Nobody has ever been beaten into a confession, huh? And the people behind the conspiracy wouldn't have the resources and the gumption to procure a false confession, huh? Man, you guys are smart.

Answer 6

All of you guys that answered this question are just feeding the chronically brain dead who need to get a life and quit blaming everything on the big brother.. I am sad to say that this is what socialism breeds. The weaker minds tend to prevail. In the early days of this country people like you guys would have been listed with the infant mortality statistics. D A M N progress...

Answer 7

I keep telling you people, it was the Romulans who brought down the Towers. WTC 7 was an experiment they did to see how easily they could actually overcome the Klingons.

Once the Klingons and Vulcans have been conquered, they will take over Earth and transport all it's citizens beyond the quadrant to work in the dilithium mines.

How many times I gotta tell ya this.

Answer 8

Since WTC 7 was actually 'pulled' by its owner, it is clear that it was demolished on purpose. This building contained a lot financial records pertaining to so many deals that were under investigation it seems likely it was brought down in order to destroy these records.

Answer 9

Any one who still believes these conspiracy theories needs a lobotomy.

Answer 10

You show me your engineering analysis that proves that the "official" analysis is incorrect and I will listen.