Who are you Rosie O'Donnell, she talks like that too. Throwing accusations without anything to back it up,
No examples, nothing
Give me an example instead of attacking then running.
2007-03-21 14:44:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Carlene W 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Read "The Vision of the Anointed" by Thomas Sowell, and then upon completion, shut the hell up. Only an elitist Democrat would ask a question so ridiculous. I've got some questions for you, smart guy: Why is all leftist thought shrouded in vague rhetoric and lacking substance, facts, and most importantly, logic? Does that sound like an intelligent thing to do? Where is the empiricism in your lofty claims and "statistics" about things like global warming, discrimination, income distribution, etc? You people seem to think those are problems only because you have dodgy methodology. How often do you strive to find stats to match your theories instead of theories to match your facts (namely Michael Moore, but there are others)?
I suggest you get a clue in a) how things really work and b) how to use proper grammar. Apparently you can possess something called 'a loser' now, unbeknownst to me. You want the contraction of 'you are', which is "you're", genius. Retake 3rd grade and then come back and talk to us.
2007-03-21 14:46:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Viginti_Tres 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I am an American, not a loser. However, if we were to follow the current Democratic leadership in this country, we would be losers (if you flee from the field of battle, you are a loser; common sense). I am an independant, but I tend to vote Republican. Realistically, I know that politicians -- both Dems and Repubs -- are really in it for themselves (for the most part); however, the DNC goes out of its way to try and make us think that what it is doing is for OUR best interest. Sorry, I'm just too much of a free-thinker to buy most of what they are selling. Everything that they promise is based on bigger, more-powerful Government; and, if you look around, everything the Government puts its hands in, just gets messy and ineffecient. Social Security, anyone?
Tell you what; let me be in charge of my own retirement, my own personal defense, my own health insurance, and my own property, and we'll call it a day. Quit giving my money to those who don't work for a living, those who are not citizens of this country, and D.C. bartenders, and I may have more to put in the collection plate on a weekly basis.
As for the truth, I'm not scared of it; I just want to try and make it a better truth. Look at the ugly truths I've mentioned above, and tell me I'm scared of it.
2007-03-21 14:44:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by musashi 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
See answer to chi man reguarding truth of posts. It's misdirecting. Like when a guy cheats on a girl he then accuses her of cheating. They obviously have had bad sexual experiences in their lives, girls making fun of their size, etc. All kidding aside, they are more interested in proving that they are right rather than which answer is the best for those involved. Best answer doesn't matter if it doesn't mean they win. The, "Who's got the biggest genitals" battle over and over again. Very sad and immature.
2007-03-21 14:45:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by mauiniki 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Because they mistakenly believe they are the only ones afraid of the truth.
So the fear of the truth sometimes grows greater among some of the Republicans. They develop a strange sense of how important it is to be "right". .....Become jealous of people who have continued to move along to continue pursuing what's best.
And forget that not always being "right" is part of those people who have succeded in pursuing what's best.
You know what I mean.
Basic insecurity about anyone knowing better than you on anything. Not until they've bought your loyalty first.
2007-03-21 14:56:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by roostershine 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
To further expand upon what Zack and arcanum7 have said---also don't forget about Margaret Sanger who pushed for a womans right to an abortion..Margarets reasoning for this(it wasent for the womans right to her body). Her reasoning was to rid the planet (and especially the USA) of the lower forms of humans which according to her are blacks and asians...and the liberals who claim to be for the minorities support abortion? Kind of makes you wonder..It was also the Republicans who fought tooth and nail to do away with slavery while the southern democrats fought it because then it meant they couldnt have a slave in their own homes...
2007-03-21 14:54:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Diggs 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Testimony before Congress is generally a witch hunt to punish decent public servants of the opposition party.
2007-03-25 01:40:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by edward m 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's interesting that your name on here is stop the klan. Especially when you accuse Republicans of being scared of the truth (I love it when you people use blanket statements).
Bet you don't know that it was Democrats that started the klan, that it was Democrats that authored and passed the Jim Crow laws, that it was Democrats that had secret/illegal wiretaps on Dr. King, and let's not forget the sitting Democrat Senator/klan leader Byrd.
Oh well, those are truths no Democrat wants to face.
2007-03-21 14:36:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
There are Republicans that say Democrats do the same thing. The country is divided now, more than ever, on political lines.
It is sad that people now judge people on the basis of the way they vote. **I am guilty of this**
Open your eyes, Democrats do the same thing as do Independents do the same thing.
2007-03-21 14:33:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Todd R 2
·
5⤊
0⤋
Most people are scared of the 'truth', period. Can't you see past the republican/democrat hoax? Divide and conquer.. The age old trick has worked so well throughout history.
They are all liars, cheats and criminals.. But they change the laws to suit them so it's all okay. Never trust a politician, they are only out for themselves & their own interests. It should be us versus them, after all they the *real* criminals.
2007-03-21 14:36:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋
Well... calling people losers doesn't necessarily foster open debate :-) That said, I do hope the court uphold's Congress's right (not just the Democrats, CONGRESS) to question Rove under oath.
2007-03-21 14:32:21
·
answer #11
·
answered by Vaughn 6
·
6⤊
0⤋