He's already said that his people will submit to being interviewed by Congress. He just doesn't want them to be under oath or any records of what is said to be kept. The oath and the records part are not executive priviledge. The agreeing to let his people appear and be questioned by Congress, is the executive priviledge. What's the problem here? There is also another clause in the deal that wouldn't allow Congress to recall anyone. So if these people are later found to be flat out lying, that's that. I don't know about you, but I prefer open government and I don't care for backroom briefings on non-national security issues. I want every politician and their tools to take an oath before they give a press conference. And no records! What the hell is that?
2007-03-21
14:10:56
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Crystal Blue Persuasion
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Man I second that sentiment Neo!
2007-03-21
14:18:55 ·
update #1
Hey Capn, If you can't discern between an adult asking a question and a child whining that's your problem. You did not have to respond pal. Sorry to put it bluntly, but you're an arrogant azz. And I din't insult Bush!
2007-03-21
14:30:54 ·
update #2