No. If it were Cena VS. Undertaker, The Undertaker would win, even if the fans were on Cena's side. I doubt McMahon would make Cena beat any of those legends, because not only are they a lot more skilled then Cena, they are respected by everyone. So, Cena would lose to all of them, (Hopefully), especially Undertaker and Hogan. They're probobly the most respected wrestlers ever.
2007-03-21 13:56:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Alex V 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Is John Cena a good wrestler? Maybe.....Possibly. Is John at the level of say.......The Rock, Stone Cold, Undertaker, Hogan? Not by a long shot. They are legends. They pretty much built or refined the wrestling industry he's having success in now. He's pretty much a flavor-of-the-month or a flash in the pan.
2007-03-21 21:06:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by WheelchairBA 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cena is the next Steve Austin.
He's the face of WWE right now, is as over as possible with the WWE fanbase, and can carry his own in the ring, even if he's not an outstanding wrestler.
There would be no point in burying Cena, even to those "legends" you mentioned, because he's much too profitable. You don't want to turn off your fan-base by having their hero lose.
Also, he already lost to Edge, so it's not like he's unbeatable. He's just profitable and WWE, as they always do, will beat that horse until it's dead.
Like Austin, he doesn't have world class in ring skills, but he knows what he's doing and he understand wrestling purity. Like Austin, he appeals to a very broad audience as well, and he's fresh, at least in the wrestling world.\
Also, did someone up there say that Ric Flair doesn't have that good ring skills? Flair is regarded as the greatest wrestler of his generation! (Which was far too long ago, and as much as I love him, he needs to retire.)
2007-03-21 21:15:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Adam C 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I see Cena more in the legacy of Flair and Hogan, I mean, guys who doesn't got incredible skills but a capacity to reach the mainstream. Comparing Cena with Rockie, the Bionic Redneck or the Deadman was like comparing Pele with Maradona, or Unitas with Namath, or Jordan with Chamberlain.
And to answer the post about Flair, I didn't said that Flair was an average wrestler, he's an awesome wrestler in his best time, but I think that there was better wrestler than Naitch, like Terry Funk, Ricky Steamboat, Tatsumi Fujinami and Masachiro Chono.
2007-03-21 20:58:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by anfclwin05 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't think that john cena could beat the rock or stone cold or even the undertaker for all i know!!!
2007-03-22 16:17:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The problem is those other guys had the talent to match their gimmick. Cena is still scratchy in the ring, but popularity wise he is at the Level that taker, Austin and The Rock are. Talent wise he is not.
2007-03-21 20:58:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dasdream 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
John Cena can't even lace the Undertaker's boots.
2007-03-21 22:50:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by almighty_malachi 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
he lost at the main event of ecw one night stand, when it was a no rules match, and that is when he lost his championship to rvd. John Cena's level is near Vito's level.
CENA WILL NEVER BE BETTER THAN THE ROCK
2007-03-21 23:56:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by beijingrocks! 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is my favorite fan but he is getting up there by how many folks that luv him
2007-03-21 22:41:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by hot_girl_maya 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yea right that little dude ain't even close to their level
2007-03-22 12:40:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by BOOTZ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋