he also supported the war effort in iraq. but it turns out, he's a leftist. he's apart of the labour party, which describes itself as the "democratic socialist" party. he became PM after 18 years of right-wing control, and he screwed it up in the UK. isnt it funny how modern-day leftists/communists/socialists around the world try to act like saints, as if the left is so incredibly peaceful? maybe theyre hoping people will forget that communism killed over 100 million people throughout history...
2007-03-21 13:09:49 · 3 answers · asked by ♦ 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, he's slime as far as the war is concerned. And, many leftist Brits think the same way, as well as conservative Torreys. But he is definitely better than Margaret Thatcher the milk snatcher.
2007-03-21 13:14:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Tony Blair did more for the UK than Thatcher ever dreamed of.
The UK is superior to most nations. The Conservatives would of sent the UK back to the stone ages.
2007-03-21 20:13:47 · answer #2 · answered by Villain 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well he is from the elite liberal media, which is a big reason Bush chose him. But I think the media views him as a traitor for taking the job.
2007-03-21 20:14:31 · answer #3 · answered by jrod517 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋