None, whatsoever, unless he seeks to impose them on me using governmental force.
"But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." Thomas Jefferson
2007-03-21 12:03:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Martin L 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, just that he's not qualified.
Re: Mitt Romney:
PROS: Romney is against abortion & opposes same sex-marriage, and he's been aggressive in courting the Christian right. He's consulted with Falwell & Franklin Graham & is scheduled to deliver the graduation address at Robertson’s Regent University this spring.
CONS: Evangelicals are skeptical of Romney's Mormon faith, but it's his alleged flip-flops that could really hurt. In his 1994 Senate & 2002 gubernatorial bids, Romney supported abortion rights & gay rights, positions he reversed as he prepared for a White House run. Last week Sam Brownback's campaign questioned his credibility.
Source(s):
Newsweek 2/26/07 edition
.
2007-03-21 12:07:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
No his religion does not bother me. I 'm in Massachusetts and he's left the state in a mess. He and Healy claimed that there was a budget surplus but in fact there is a deficit. Cities and towns are in financial trouble because he cut aid to them early on. The roads across the state are a nightmare. I could go on and on. By the time he was done the school I taught in had no supplies. This was an inner city school and I had to buy pens and pencils for my students. The teachers in this city got no raise in almost 5 years. Some teachers with families qualified for food stamps.
2007-03-21 12:16:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anna W 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. I dislike the way he took care of Boston, and hope Dival Patrick will do a better job after the whole office make-over, and his wife's depression is solved.
2007-03-21 12:12:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by triple_da 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
It must matter!! Thats how Bush got his election the second time!! He scared the crap out of christians and then he became a dictator. Hmmm sounds like someone he desperatly wanted out of power!!
2007-03-25 03:28:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by april S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. I voted for him for Govorner of Massachusetts, mostly because he was not a Democrat. His religious affiliation, as long as it is not Satanism, is not that important to me. If it comes down to him or Hillary, no question I will vote for him again.
2007-03-21 12:13:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by SteveA8 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
not at all. some people who answered this question need to educate themselves on what LDS people actually believe.
2007-03-23 06:18:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by jimmideon49 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No but his flip-flopping on Abortion has everything to do with why I will not be voting for him.
2007-03-21 13:17:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yeah I have hard time voting for anyone who believes that they should be allowed to have other peoples wives sealed to them after death.
2007-03-21 12:10:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kenneth W 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
No. Why should it? Unless Mormons start flying planes into buildings, there is no reason why it should.
2007-03-21 12:04:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
0⤊
1⤋