Do I understand these carbon offsets correctly?

Question

The world only likes the pollution you pay for?

Answer 1

The 100% market design of the carbon policy is a goofy american invention. It allows any emitting company to whine and get free allowances for which they pay nothing and then past the cost of something they received for free to customers leading to windfall profits.

This goofy american design has been chosen to accomodate them but they finally decided to step out the Kyoto Protocol at the last minute, prefearing to blame the chinese who are just beginning their industrialization instead of fairly acknowledging their own impact. Before taking the next step with the neocons governement who denied it before acknowledging it is real again (in order not to have like the Vatican to apologize 500 years later for Gallileo).

Instead of the Kyoto Protocol, the US has developped the AP6 who even according to McCain is "only an act on public relations". The AP6 doesn´t put
any targets and in the participating nations, only China set an intensity target for itself, taking the lead over the US.

"The contribution under the AP6 is purely voluntary and so should it be with my own tax contribution to the state !!!!"

Beside that, the US has also developped and wasted money in token solutions like hydrogen which is not a source of energy but an expensive carrier. Since it can still be produced from oil, this has been the focus of the Bush administration.

A carbon tax, which collects money that is reused in the economy is better since it taxes CO2 on a fair even rate, avoiding distortion in competition. It is furthermore easier to collect since counting oil imports and coal extraction is easy. The collected money can then be used to buy carbon credits on a fair basis on a properly managed market

Answer 2

it incredibly is a bull$hit thank you to declare you're doing some thing for the ecosystem. in basic terms Al Gore kinds would have you ever suspect otherwise on a similar time as he sucks down electrical energy at his mansion at a value of 10x that of a classic american better half and childrens on a consistent with sq. foot foundation.. (OOOH< although that is okay because of the fact he buys offsets....nicely he buys them by his very own corporation). right it incredibly is the deal, you're in truth saying I certainly have sufficient disposeable earnings to pay somebody else to shelter ability on a similar time as I proceed to eat at a classic or intense cost. the subsequent Webster dictionary would have carbon offset shoppers indexed decrease than the notice hypocrite. If every physique gave me an offset as a cutting-edge, i may be extremely disenchanted by ability of the thought. Sorry, I exceptionally much forgot to point that it incredibly is quite probable a scam on account which you haven't any longer have been given any evidence that the acquisition of pronounced "offsets" will effect in every physique keeping ability on behalf of the "offset". Like one in each of the different solutions pronounced, the guy or entity it incredibly is meant to make themselves greater efficent ought to in basic terms be wasteful someplace else to "offset your offset".

Answer 3

Most of it seems to be like a tax or hype. However small independent projects might be helpful if you like supporting renewal projects. I like this blog http://mygreenproject.blogspot.com/ .