Look ima republican so you all know im not voting for Hillary for multiple reasons. But I wanted to ask this one question for both sides of the playing field:
Have you considered the fact that no matter how left wing you are and love Muslim religion, that our enemy treats women as a second tier citizen basicly. They do not feel they should speak amongst men, expose even their face etc... they should be completely annonymous.
I know the democrats want to solve this conflict we are having with the middle east through diplomacy. But did it ever occur to you that if we chose a woman as our elected leader that no one in the middle east will take her seriousely and might even fight harder? No diplomacy can be established if we have a women at the top negotiating the terms.
And im being seriouse folks, its not about right or left here, we all want this to end, the republicans think continuing fighting is the answer, democrats think diplomacy is a better strategy, but in the end
2007-03-21 11:22:15 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
if we elect a female president it will cripple our ability to do both?
Does anyone else agree?
2007-03-21 11:22:36 · update #1
@ Godly Reality Check
"Whats your sources that the Middle East Muslims think this way...
Naah I'm just kidding. "
Lol when I first started reading that I was almost about to explode. People seriousely ask questions like this though, like Muslims dont dislike women they are equal in every way. lolol, so misinformed.
2007-03-21 11:30:16 · update #2
You are talking to Democrats. They are the ones that Communists use to refer to as: "our useful idiots".
They don't understand, or care.
Whenever some woman accused Clinton of attacking them, the Democrats cheered Bill on, and supported him.
The Muslims consider women as animals (I lived there.), but Democrats don't care.
They don't care how women are treated.
Democrats will support any Democrat that will surrender to the Terrorists.
(Bear in mind, that Hillary is considered more of a man, than a woman. Janet Reno calls Hillary: her man.)
2007-03-21 11:25:56 · answer #1 · answered by wolf 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
You've got to be kidding. You are basically justifying discrimination by so called Christians based on the fact that Muslims discriminate. That's a bogus argument anyway. Did you ever see any news reports throughout the 90s? The official spokesperson for the PLO was Leila Shahid. She is now the envoy of Palestine to the European Commission in Brussels.
2007-03-21 11:44:09 · answer #2 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Whats your sources that the Middle East Muslims think this way...
Naah I'm just kidding.
2007-03-21 11:27:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think if we choose our leaders on that basis alone then we have lost the war. I'm not a Hillary fan myself. But if indeed the most qualified leader were a woman, we would be doing ourselves a disservice to not elect her. They can negotiate with the Secretary of State or the National Security Advisor if they're that hung up on it.
2007-03-21 11:26:29 · answer #4 · answered by Jim C 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The mid-east took Margaret Thatcher seriously. They also took Golda Meier seriously in Egypt. They also took the former president of Pakistan (a woman) seriously.
Your propaganda, anti-woman, anti-democracy bullsh*t is very obvious here. BTW, the left was trying to get the Bush adminsitration to do something about the human rights abuses against the women during the Taliban regime. He didn't do anything except invite the Taliban regime to America to discuss oil and gas reserves in their country. The Taliban put down women reporters in the audience who asked them hard questions about their human rights abuses in their country against women. They told the reporter that her husband must be very ashamed of her for opening her mouth. Now, that said. What is Bush doing about the human rights abuses in Saudi ARabia that are perpetrated against women. Women are the ones that are punished the most and killed the most in that country in government sanctioned beheadings for supposedly going against the laws of Islamic extremism. Now, when you say that democrats love the Muslim religion, what f*cking planet are you on? No liberal loves Islam extremism, just like we don't like Christian extremism in this country. Democracy and Theocracy will not mix. Theocracy is a government that gets its law from a religious text such as the Koran or Bible. A Democracy is inherently and particularly secular. And, our laws are formed out of the enlightenment and our laws are from the text of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. Get that straight.
It's obvious no man can bring peace or create peace in the Mid-East. My god, they've mad a sh*t hole out of that country. A woman would be a much more logical choice.
2007-03-21 11:32:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
i do no longer see what the huge fuss is. despite she is doing, borrowing from herself, etc., is nicely with in the regulations of the elections regulations. in case you come across this fairly hypocritical, do no longer blame her, blame the regulation. you do no longer in effortless terms like the marketing campaign financing rules, then talk on your Congressional representative and your Senators, and cause them to alter the regulation. do no longer blame the undesirable woman for attempting to stay out a dream. that's amazingly un-American and Un-democratic people to think of like that. you do unlike Hillary Clinton, then do no longer vote for her. as long as she isn't breaking any rules, she is nicely interior her rights to do despite she is doing. i individually think of she might make a detrimental President yet I do appreciate her braveness and perseverance. that's plenty for a woman to realize in our us of a. I say, each and all of the skill to her for attempting!
2016-10-02 13:00:45 · answer #6 · answered by teters 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's not accually true. islam is accually very progressive in that area, the middle east only let women have any power when islam came around and said both sexes were equal. There are certainly people who Twist the Koran to their favor, but this happens in any religion.
However, that's the perception in the US. Utterly wrong, but I don't blame you for believing it. Many people do.
2007-03-21 11:28:00 · answer #7 · answered by The Big Box 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think it might be a reality check- there are other countries who currently have female presidents/prime ministers, have had them, and might have them in a few years.
I think it might be good to have these people have to deal with powerful women. and a woman in office would work to free women from oppression.
2007-03-21 11:28:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I have pondered this question myself, and I have to say I agree with you.
I just don't think I could stand hearing her screaming screeching voice yelling at me for 4 years. Then there's the Hillbilly Hillary .......that there Hillary would make me puke!!!
2007-03-21 11:30:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
You do have a point.... But who would allow such a person ( used lightly) to ever become a President...NOT me
2007-03-21 11:31:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋