Your question does'nt make any sense. Bush is wrong, no matter what party he belongs to.
2007-03-21 10:42:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Vinegar Taster 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
As an independent who is more concerned about the country than any political party, Yes, you better believe it i'd still support the subpoenas. My question is what is Bush trying so hard to hide?
2007-03-21 17:44:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The subpoenas that the Republicans issued Clinton were a $42 million witch hunt. At least his people testified under oath. They probably had nothing to hide.
2007-03-21 17:43:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by wyldfyr 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
What if Bush were a Democrat?Would the Republicans mount the same argument they did in 1994,that Executive Privilege is just a smoke screen to avoid testimony under oath?
2007-03-21 17:43:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Zapatta McFrench 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
My opinion does not change. If the shoe were on the other foot you bet I would support the subpoenas. Wrong is wrong regardless of party.
2007-03-21 17:57:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes Sir...something is amiss. They are innocent until found guilty. Subpoenas are part of the fact finding process, before trial.
2007-03-21 17:41:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by ShadowCat 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes
2007-03-21 17:42:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No...it sets precidence that you don't want for future administrations, whether Democrat or Republican. What's the big deal even Clinton did it! Geez people move on!
2007-03-21 17:42:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yup. even though politics is obviously a big part of how federal prosecutors are handled, the fact is that gonzales and bush fumbled their handling of this one. if they had done it differently there would be no outcry. regardless of whether he is demo or repub i still would like to think that prosecutors are free from politics so yes i would support it.
2007-03-21 17:41:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by asg_is_chillin 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Since I don't support the subpoenas period, no.
2007-03-21 17:42:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋