Would you, given her less than credible background, still toss your vote to Hillary if she won the nomination or do you think there is no way she can win with Obama in the mix? And do you think he has a certain appeal that she could not acheive no matter what?
2007-03-21 10:02:20 · 31 answers · asked by C H 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Sorry, Hill, won't vote for you. Nothing personal - I just don't TRUST you! I guess if you win the nomination, I'll just have to do a write-in vote like I did last time!
- A faithful Democrat - but not THAT faithful.
2007-03-21 10:49:49 · answer #1 · answered by lesroys 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i'm a Hillary supporter, yet i won't write in my vote, nor will I vote for McCain. Any Liberal who might vote for McCain merits 4, or probably 8 extra years of this mess in Iraq, unemployment, interest loss, loan mess ups, an imperial Presidency, neutering Congress, ignoring regulations, and so on. and so on. A write-in vote is a misplaced vote. Who gets the message? that's merely merely taking a vote removed from the Democratic Candidate and solves not something. It does not help save a Bush Clone out of place of work. i will have no area of that, even although i would be disappointed if Hillary loses, not because of fact i don't think of Obama is completely able to the Presidency, yet because of fact i think in following the Democratic technique. we are fortunate in that we've 2 able frontrunners. i will swallow my sadness and vote for the Democratic Candidate, because of fact I do want replace.
2016-11-27 20:21:42 · answer #2 · answered by defranco 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I fail to understand how Senator Clinton, with her decades of experience, is less credible than Obama. He may be an excellent man, but he is inexperienced. All his presidential run shows is ambition without thought.
He would do better to stay where he is and learn how things work. The Vice Presidency will do him less good for a run once he has established himself as more than a new face.
Clinton would be my first choice. Her health care plan would have worked, but it got scuttled by the HMOs and Pharmaceutical lobbies. Give her a little more power and some time and she might actually do some good stuff.
Mainly, however, I would vote for her because of the vile and despicable way the GOP went after her as First Lady. No attack was beneath them, and no evidence was provided but gossip and slander. Never was a wronged woman more thoroughly attacked.
If one can be judged by the quality of their enemies, Hillary Clinton should do. Look at the source of the attacks: revealed criminals like Tom DeLay and adulterous hypocrites like Newt Gingrich. If those guys hate you, you must be all right.
2007-03-22 02:11:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
As a democrat, I probably wouldn't vote for either candidate in a primary election, and it has nothing to do with how well they would lead the country. I believe that Hillary is far too divisive among democrats, and while I like Obama, my fear is that putting him on the ticket will be tantamount to handing the presidency right back to the republicans in 2008. If he wins the primary, I will vote along my party lines and hope that he wins it. I can't say the same for Hillary. If she ends up on the ticket, I might actually be persuaded to vote for a moderate republican.
2007-03-21 10:26:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Right now I'm a fan of both. Yes, Hillary does have some dirt in her past but I really do think she can make some better changes and a difference. So far I'm really a big fan of Obama. I like that he admits to his mistakes and doesn't apologize for it. So I'm open to either and to be honest with you it's about time we have a very different face in the White House to represent America better.
2007-03-21 13:18:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hillary's face will drop even more after she loses the primaries. Her integrity is ruined and her ability to lead has been destroyed with her needing to visit Yahoo to ask folks how she should run the country. If she's looking for someone to tell her how to do it then maybe she should vote for one of the other candidates.
She should take a page from Al Gore’s page and focus on key issues and stop trying to have a conversation with folks in her comfortable living room. She hasn’t gotten her hands dirty once and I personally find it Disgusting and the conversation is OVER! And for the Life of Dixie Hill !!!! TAKE THAT DAYUM YAHOO AD DOWN. I feel like she’s trying to brainwash the Yahoo members.
2007-03-21 10:15:03 · answer #6 · answered by Stealth 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Obama doesn't stand a chance. Nobody is going to let a black man be the president, come on! He is a minority. Only 33% of the U.S. population is black and almost half of it is in prison!
I'd like to see Kucinich win, but I don't think he will because it would be too good to be true.
I'd like to see Al Gore win, but I don't think he will run again.
Clinton is agreeable, and will probably win the Democratic place on the ballot.
I think that if Hillary is elected we will see at least one huge positive change, and probably more.
I think that if Obama is elected, nothing will get done. He's a tool.
2007-03-21 10:29:13 · answer #7 · answered by shell 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I wouldn't vote for Hillary if she were running for dog catcher. Obama is likeable but I don't think he has enough experience, the interviews I've seen he doesn't give real deep answers.
2007-03-21 10:10:15 · answer #8 · answered by wanda3s48 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I am a big Obama fan, I voted for him and I'm from Illinois. If Hillary does get the nomination, I'll support her too. I do like Obama better than her, but I trust that she will do a good job if she is elected.
2007-03-21 10:12:52 · answer #9 · answered by Netta 3 · 0⤊ 5⤋
I am a conservative, so I don't really care for either of them. But, I would definitely vote for Obama. I think he has a lot of charisma and great character. Hillary could almost make me vomit though.
2007-03-21 10:36:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋