In the old morals lying was wrong. But the NeoBushCon morals lying is good.
Keep your eye on Gonzo & Bush they will have a skyrocketing successs at those NeoMorals.
2007-03-21 09:58:01 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Speaking of lying:
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman, monica lewinsky."
2007-03-21 10:00:31 · answer #1 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 5⤊ 4⤋
Leviticus 18:22 is honestly quoted in many cases, and many times incorrectly. What it says is: ?? ??? ???--?? ???? ????? ??? ????? ??? not shall you lie with guy [indoors the] mattress of woman, [it is] against custom. The be conscious is tow'ebah, if reality learn capacity frowned upon. it is for specific not asserting sin and the context additionally specifies "indoors the mattress of woman", it is strategies-blowing, by using actuality if it became into incorrect to place with a guy frequently, why might this be precise? curiously extra that it became into asserting to not fool around which incorporate your boyfriend on your companion's mattress. As men have been frequently those in capacity indoors the variety of existence on the time, it could be plenty extra conceivable for a guy to hold yet yet another sexual better half living house than it might for a girl, it is probably why it is gender specific. The rules listed under are relatively being suggested to Moses, who's a male, so "you" is a different guy. Tow'ebah is especially utilized to seek for suggestion from nutritional rules, menstruation, mixing of fabric, and distinctive minor themes.
2016-11-27 20:20:06 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is pretty funny that the Cons tried to discredit Al Gore today without allowing him a rebuttal answer. Senator Boxer spoke up and noted that the Republicans don't make the rules anymore and lost that privilege by losing the last election. They were going on over his Oscar winning documentary, and he spoke up and won the debate of coarse. They just don't get what morals and values really mean.
2007-03-21 11:33:19 · answer #3 · answered by leonard bruce 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually, it was Pelosi and Reid who promised to "restore the Moral High ground in Washington" in the run up to the 2006 election.
How is that working out for you?
2007-03-21 10:02:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
He has his own version of the Lords Word, the Dark Lord that is.
2007-03-21 10:01:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Your question is based on "Ad-Hominem" (A fallacy in which someone verbally attacks another person in order to avoid a debate) and therefore invalidates your question. It also shows your ignorance.
Quite sad, but this is what liberals are reduced to nowadays.
2007-03-21 10:03:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Your ignorance is stunning. "Thou shalt not lie"??? For the Bible-impaired, that's not a commandment
2007-03-21 10:00:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
I never heard of that guy or is that a nother childish liberal lamer. HAHAHA, now I get it. Makes me remember back when I was in 3rd grade.
2007-03-21 10:03:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Wow.... instead of all the name calling, how bout you and the rest of your party come up with positive solutions for change?
2007-03-21 10:03:21 · answer #9 · answered by Dog Lover 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋