What is federalism?

Answer 1

Political federalism is a political philosophy in which a group or body of members are bound together (Latin: foedus, covenant) with a governing representative head. The term federalism is also used to describe a system of government in which sovereignty is constitutionally divided between a central governing authority and constituent political units (like states or provinces), Federalism is the system in which the power to govern is shared between the national & state governments, creating what is often called a federation. Proponents are often called federalists.

In Canada, federalism means opposition to sovereigntist movements (usually that of Quebec). In parts of Europe, "federalist" is often used to describe those who favor a stronger federal government (or European Union government) and weaker provincial governments. The same is historically true in the United States, with those who generally favor a confederation, or weaker federal government and stronger state governments, being called "anti-federalists". In federal nations of Europe (such as Germany, Austria and Switzerland), the term "strong federalism" means sub-national states having more power than the national government, in contrast with a centralist system.

The state or regional governments strive to cooperate with all the nations. The old statement of this position can be found in The Federalist, that argued that federalism helps enshrine the principle of due process, limiting arbitrary action by the state. First, federalism can limit government power to infringe rights, since it creates the possibility that a legislature wishing to restrict liberties will lack the constitutional power, while the level of government that possesses the power lacks the desire. Second, the legalistic decision-making processes of federal systems limit the speed with which governments can act.

The argument that federalism helps to secure democracy and human rights has been influenced by the contemporary public choice theory. It has been argued that in smaller political units, individuals can participate more directly than in a monolithic unitary government. Moreover, individuals dissatisfied with conditions in one State have the option of moving to another. Of course, this argument assumes that a freedom of movement between States is necessarily secured by a federal system.

The capacity of a federal system to protect civil liberties has been disputed. Often there is confusion between the rights of individuals with those of states. In Australia, for example, some of the major intergovernmental conflicts in recent decades have been the direct result of federal intervention to secure the rights of minority groups, and required limitations on the powers of state governments. It is also essential to avoid confusion between the constraints set by judicial review, the constitutional power of the courts to overrule the legislature and the executive, and federalism itself.

On one hand, some countries have bad habits of denying civil liberties to black people, women, and others. On the other hand, the laws and constitutions of some states have protected such minorities with legal rights and protections that exceed those of the U.S. Constitution and the U.S. Bill of Rights.

atp

Answer 2

exams and balances...look into the Constituion one occasion is the president can veto legislations surpassed by using congress and confess can override that veto with a 2/3 vote in each and each chamber yet another occasion is the president nominates federal judges/justices besides as ambassadors and business enterprise heads however the senate has to approve (confirm those appointments) there are lots extra in the Constituion. exams and balances act to stay away from one branch from becoming to be too effective. Separation of powers does the comparable concern it divides powers between the thee branches who then verify one yet another. Federalism is a equipment of shared powers between the national and state governments. The purpose is to stay away from one point from being all effective/tyrannical. so some distance as massive and small states you could look into the Connecticut compromise which resulted in the combination of the hot Jersey plan and the Virginia plan to offer the senate and the homestead. The senate pleases small states by way of fact each and every state regardless of length gets 2 senators. the homestead pleases massive states by way of fact allocation is predicated upon inhabitants so better states get extra representatives. lower back, the purpose is to stability ability to cut up it up in considered one of those way that one corporation, group or in spite of the case would be from getting too lots ability. desire this helped i'm hoping I understood the question!

Answer 3

A government model that believes in a strong central (national, federal) government, which has override authority over states.

As opposed to a confederacy, where the states have more power.

Answer 4

“ A theory of Government by which powers are divided between a national government and state governments, each have their own areas of substantive jurisdiction ”

“ Federalism refers to the division of sovereignty between Government at two levels: one at the center and one in each territory/state ”

Answer 5

we must have a whole class on here looking for the same answer for homework.
Federalism is a political view on how to run a government.

Answer 6

Can somone help me get the best answer for this question?