I really enjoyed,it so much I bought it.
I thought the acting was great and the plot well done.
Then all these critics gave it a bad report, and everyone followed like sheep.
What did you think about it???
2007-03-21 09:00:10 · 20 answers · asked by BrilliantPomegranate 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Yes I read the book before hand
2007-03-21 11:02:46 · update #1
I read the book in two days-couldn't put it down! I thought watching the film was just like reading the book again-I can't understand why it was given a bad report either.
2007-03-21 22:15:58 · answer #1 · answered by Somer 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I read the book and then saw the film what was the point in making the film it was exactly like book down to the exact detail.
it seemed a waste of time,
it was ok.
2007-03-22 11:09:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I watched it, but didn't really enjoy it, I couldn't see Tom Hanks on the role of Professor Robert Langdon, he just wasn't right. If they make Angels and Demons as they are threatening to do, I won't be watching it, especially if Tom Hanks is back in the role.
Personally I preferred the books - films are never the same, and this one was kind of disappointing.
2007-03-21 16:11:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I liked it because I was so thoroughly entertained by the book. I love mystery and fiction and it was one of the best I've read. The movie was great. I loved seeing all the places mentioned in the book. Very good.
2007-03-21 16:03:24 · answer #4 · answered by babygyrl_nyc 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, it was awful. You might want to listen to the critics more often. It had zero cohesiveness. The editing was terrible. It also deviated from the source material too much for my taste.
I have, however, heard this misguided opinion before but it is usually from people who have never read the book. Did you read it?
2007-03-21 16:13:16 · answer #5 · answered by The Misanthrope 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I liked the movie alot to. But alot of the movies i like end up getting a bad review so whateve!!! lol, but i think people now-a-days just run with the crowd!!! not me!!! stick out and dont be afraid to say you like something just because someone else doesnt
2007-03-21 16:05:25 · answer #6 · answered by Toria 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
For me, it was one of the few books that translated to the screen well. A badly written book made for a badly done movie.
I am sorry, but Dan Brown is not that good of a writer
2007-03-21 16:35:43 · answer #7 · answered by Experto Credo 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I have not seen it only because I am the only person in the world who thought the book was dull and overrated. So at least I am not a sheep.
2007-03-21 16:10:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It was nearly as bad as the new James Bond film, and I thought that was awful.
2007-03-21 16:08:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It wasn't a bad film and i don't think it deserved all the bad reviews it got. However I do think that the book is better
2007-03-21 16:04:47 · answer #10 · answered by Baps . 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋