Why do most people think the Pats have had a better offseason than the Broncos?

Question

The Broncos have somethin happening almost every day, the Pats get someone 1 a month.

Answer 1

i dont think the pats had a better offseason then the broncos the only good person they got was donte stallworth and the broncos got dre bly, travis henry, brandon stokley clearly the broncos had a better offseason

Answer 2

The pats might win one sport. If even whilst the Broncos suck they beat the Pats. The broncos extremely are no longer sturdy all yet have overwhelmed the PATS the final 3 video games in a row. inclusive of the sport final 3 hundred and sixty 5 days in Foxboro the place all people from the owner of the group to the ball boy had the sport rotated and the PATS nevertheless lost! If the PATS might have performed the broncos in the playoffs they might have in no way made it to a Superbowl. all of us talking with regard to the PATS triumphing isn't managing reality. they're sturdy, yet no longer lower back the Broncos. have not they met 9 out of the final ten years are the Broncos like 9 - a million.

Answer 3

Look I'm not saying that the Broncos didn't have a great off-season. But come on the Pats didn't just randomly pick well thought of players to add to a team and hope one does good. We've seen through the years that there is definitely a method to Belicheks madness and with a well planed receiving core with the new franchised Asaunte Samuel and a healthy Rodney Harrison, who knows how far it could take them. Brady may end up with a handful of rings!

Answer 4

Ultimately, it doesn't really matter who has the better offseason. Normally, its the Redskins that have really good offseasons, and we all know how that turns out.

With that said, though, the Patriots are just the more covered team. The Broncos have made some fine moves (though Bly is overrated, trust me on this), and while the Patriots seem to of added in an entirely new receiving core, it isn't as impressive as what Denver has done, particularly now that they picked up Stokely.

Answer 5

are the Broncos competeing with the Pats to see who does more in the offseason? and no the Pat dont get one person per month they got about 5 players this month

Answer 6

Why dont you shut the hell up. This is the 3rd time you are asking about why the Pats did better in free agency than the Broncos. It isnt a competition.

The Pats did do better by the way. They got Donte Stallworth, Kelly Washington, Wes Welker, Adalius Thomas, Kyle Brady, Sammy Morris, and Eddie Jackson.

BEAT THAT.

Answer 7

The Patriots have made a number of big moves, they have signed Donte Stallworth, they made a good trade was Wes Welker, they made another great deal for Adaluis Thomas. Add to this the fact that they were already in the AFC Championship last year. I have been following free agency and the Broncos have no made moves of this caliber.

Answer 8

Both have done extremely well in FA. Denver has added much more depth and talent but Pats have gotten probably the overall better player (the Ravens LB). Still these two teams have out shined the entire league with their FA moves. Very smart, very well thought out, both have improved themselves.

Answer 9

Its not the number of transactions its the caliber. And the Pats who were tough before are going to be extremely tough this next year. Brady must be smiling at how his team is shaping up. Hes never really had any "Star" players....Hes just had good and complete football players and now he has Donte Stallworth.....

Answer 10

You obviously haven't been paying attention to free agency...They have been doing the best...Lets see...The Broncos lost their QB to retirement, got Travis Henry...signed Ramsey to backup Culter...Thats about it...oh...OK Dre Bly...The Pats got 3 WRs, a TE, a RB and the best LB in FA...oh...and a DB...