English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

To be a critical blunder portraying her true self rather than the more moderate version she has been trying to project?

2007-03-21 08:41:27 · 15 answers · asked by kerfitz 6 in Politics & Government Politics

The question I am referring to is the one where she asks what we can do to promote alternative energy use. Then suggests using "excess" oil company profits to fund research.

2007-03-21 08:56:36 · update #1

15 answers

No one can deny she said it anymore. Now she's said it at least twice. It is the true her and but one reason I could not vote for her.

2007-03-21 08:56:39 · answer #1 · answered by JB 6 · 2 0

Shows me she may have a law degree but has no idea how economics works. The oil companies will just pass the cost on to the consumer.

2007-03-21 15:48:33 · answer #2 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 3 1

She is what some of the power structure of the Democratic party would call a Pseudo-dem, A chocolatey Demecratic covered marshmallowy conservative center.....

Its a clinton bar yummmy.....

2007-03-21 15:47:07 · answer #3 · answered by Johnny Mek 4 · 1 1

True. And, the photo is about 20 years old to boot!

2007-03-21 15:47:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

She'd already stated as much in a public speach. It IS a blunder, but it's not a new one.

2007-03-21 15:44:48 · answer #5 · answered by Michael E 5 · 3 1

Who knows if it is even legit. Click on her name and listed under about me, every reference is Hillary was raised here, Hillary did this, Hillary did that. Don't you think if she wrote it it would say I was raised here, I did this, I did that......lol Nobody interjects their name in place of I....lol

2007-03-21 15:46:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I think we should fund it using 'excess' cattle futures earnings.

2007-03-21 16:36:31 · answer #7 · answered by mikehunt29 5 · 1 0

I'd rather have her in charge than that sleazy husband of hers or the megalomaniac warmonger we have now.

2007-03-21 15:49:50 · answer #8 · answered by Alan S 7 · 0 1

Showing the socialist or communist side of you is always a bad thing!

2007-03-21 15:54:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I read her the riot act. That shrew! Told her also that I'm basically sick of seeing her mug everywhere on Yahoo.

2007-03-21 15:45:36 · answer #10 · answered by chickyboom 3 · 7 2

fedest.com, questions and answers