Firstly, they all have higher I.Q.'s and can express themselves properly in English.
2007-03-21 08:23:23 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3mllhjHApA
He's a moron.
2007-03-21 09:03:42 · update #1
I personally feel that a hampster would be better than Bush.
2007-03-21 08:27:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
To Nomo
From the spirit of Ronald Reagan, former President of the United States.
Every President has problems that he must face polls and opinions of the electors or voters. This pettiness has exceeded most others, probably because of the Internet and computers in the hands of nearly every American.
The problem that poses is that everyone who can speak his bit is not seeing the entire picture. There are things that the President knows that the general public has no business knowing, shouldn't know for the sake of secrecy from the enemy and other reasons that need not be explained here.
That said, I am in the position to see what is happening anywhere I choose. And I tell you to stop before you put down your President, to the delight of the enemy, and pray for him instead. The present National situation is nothing to joke about or belittle.
The people of this Nation are in grave danger. The enemy is only waiting for the signal to put evil plans into place and act upon them.
No President is perfect, but they give their life to serve. Election time is the time to give your opinion and make your choice, that won't be much longer.
Change your own personal attitude with prayer for guidance, for yourself and for the President.
Thanks for the chance to give my thoughts to this grave matter.
2007-03-21 09:00:12 · answer #2 · answered by J.Marie M 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No I don't believe they all would be better. Some of them sure. You say they ALL have higher IQs than Bush. That is debateable, I haven't seen the results of their IQ tests. Have you?
As far as speaking proper English. Being a southerner I understand him very well. Sorry you have problems.
2007-03-21 08:35:57 · answer #3 · answered by namsaev 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No I don't. How do you know they have higher IQs? Did you test them? People with very high IQs don't make good politicians anyway. Oh, and I've never heard of a sentence starting with "firstly" but you would know better then me, Einstein.
2007-03-21 08:30:06 · answer #4 · answered by charlie_the_carpenter 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Actually, from the crop as we know it now (Obama, Clinton, McCain, and Dodd), there wouldn't be a nickel's worth of difference.
Thompson would be an improvement. The rest wouldn't be improvement enough to justify the expense of ordering new business cards.
2007-03-21 08:28:45 · answer #5 · answered by open4one 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
How do you know what Bush's IQ is? Oh, and if you're going to criticize somebody else's English, I wouldn't be making up a word like "Firstly."
2007-03-21 08:26:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Sonny - MIckey Mouse would be much, much better than Bush.
His IQ is in fact higher and most certainly so is his English!
2007-03-21 08:30:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I've said it before and I'll say it again: a jar of mayonnaise would make a better president than Bush.
2007-03-21 08:27:42 · answer #8 · answered by The Doctor 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
What, you want Hillary Rodham (Clinton only because she had to to help Bill's career) or Barack Hussein Obama?
2007-03-21 08:28:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Of course they would. Kusinich comes close but the rest are way above Bush.
2007-03-21 08:26:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋