2007-03-21 08:04:18 · 13 answers · asked by akash s 2 in Sports ➔ Cricket
I think Shreesanth is a better option.
2007-03-21 08:14:50 · answer #1 · answered by Sanjay K 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Irfan Pathan Should deffinatly be playing against lanka because he can bat and bowl. plus agarkar and shreesanth are very expensive in their bowling. also u have to go with a little bit of experince with pathan even though he is young himself , shreesanth is still learning
2007-03-21 21:16:15 · answer #2 · answered by K DaWg 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
While Agarkar has not been successful in the world cup till now, he is a bowler with proven record and as Sreesant and Pathan are not considered as good as Agarkar, no chances should be taken against the Sri Lanka Match and winning combination should be retained.
2007-03-21 15:52:40 · answer #3 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The mistake India team still continues is evaluating players opt to conditions, that is why they are loosing matches even to Bangladesh and always inconsistent... why they are not looking to the succesful sides ahead and follow the good things...
Sreesanth would have been included ahead of Agarkar in West Indies conditions, I still believe Karthik (even Pathan) is a better option than Sehwag also.
2007-03-22 03:29:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say put pathan on the team...he delivers with fire, while sreesanth is a bit hit and miss
Although, the whole team has been very inconsistent throughout all the matches played, and some bowlers have become very unpredictable
2007-03-21 17:11:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO, I think that a tree branch would be in the path of a park, especially if that plank was next to a match. But, if the powers that be want it that way, then...........Hey, sweetie! My Indian princess just got back from work! COOL! So, as I was saying, If the people want a tre.........what honey? My reading glasses? Oh, thanks. Wait a minute! What the ****!
2007-03-21 17:37:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I THINK BOTH OF THEM SHOULD BE IN THE TEAM, BY REPLACING AGARKAR AND KUMBLE (OR) HARBHAJAN.
WE SHOULD PLAY WITH 5 BOWLERS AGAINST THE LANKA MATCH.THE FIVE BOWLERS SHOULD BE:
ZAHEER
MUNAF
PATHAN
SREESANTH
KUMBLE (OR)HARBHAJAN.
2007-03-22 00:24:47 · answer #7 · answered by ramsundar 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
India should have tried them against Bermuda.
The team should not be changed now.
They are short of practice for this crucial match.
2007-03-22 03:51:06 · answer #8 · answered by Elango 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pathan - he is an all rounder
2007-03-21 15:10:45 · answer #9 · answered by swapna m 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pathan all the way............
he rrrrocks
2007-03-21 15:24:31 · answer #10 · answered by :( The Cric luver :) 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋