http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070320103344AAyG5nK&r=w&pa=FZptHWf.BGRX3OFMhjBQUHMK1bNgNqMW8dsHZEeyrsurkthtfQ--&paid=answered#I412JEq_VDZp8DkQ5ADy
2007-03-21 07:52:44 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I am sure that's on the up and up. Why questions and no answers?
2007-03-21 08:08:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
How can you call taking excess oil profits (BY THE WAY NO SUCH THING EXISTS ) and using them for anything .
A tax on business is a tax on people . What part of that do you not get . Sooorrry that was a little harsh on my part .
SO when Hillary talks about taking it from one place and using it in another she is still talking about my money .
Since I am not happy with how they spent the last chunk of change they got I have quit working for profit .
This will not stop them but a sleep well at night knowing I am no longer contributing anything more then I have to .
2007-03-21 15:04:18 · answer #2 · answered by trouble maker 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I do not mind Hillary posting her questions and her picture there is better than the one she uses in her ads. If the question was a big shocker or had anything to do with something a Presidential candidate would use to promote themselves then the Conservatives might worry.
2007-03-21 15:08:38 · answer #3 · answered by George G 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
im a conservative and certainly never raged. I think its silly that the questions allegedly asked by Hillary, have a proposition with no answer.
IN other words... she asked before what to do about health care. Well its odd she had a plan over a decade ago and doesnt have one now.
She now has a plan to take away profits from oil companies but is askin us what to do with the money. again no plan. At least thats what the questions tell me.
So i find it amusing. I really chuckle when I read them.
2007-03-21 15:02:55 · answer #4 · answered by sociald 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Consevatives Believe in free Speech in contrast to the Liberals who are promoting the "Fairness Doctrine" which is designed to silence the right as is Campaign Finance Reform law. Congress shall make no law abridging political speech. If I recall, A few Rino Republicans and the Democrat party Endorsed CFR. Your party is promoting the Fairness Doctrine.
2007-03-21 15:05:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The oil companies already pay more than their fair share of tax. This is nonsense. The federal government taxes on gas is now 18 cents a gallon. They tax the companies, they tax us, and they still want more. Why is it the government cannot do with less? How about paying down our debt. You would think with all the taxes they collect they could that!
2007-03-21 15:01:57 · answer #6 · answered by Matt 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, not because she posted another question. Her idea is not smart. What is "excessive" when it comes to profits? Government makes the largest profit off of every gallon of gas and pees it away on useless crap. So isn't government making excessive profits off of my hard earned money.
2007-03-21 15:03:16 · answer #7 · answered by az 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am not a conservative, nor am I raging, but I do wonder about her question being posted in the Elections forum instead of the Science forum.
2007-03-21 15:02:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, fiscal conservatives agree with her on this point. Neocons, yes.
2007-03-21 14:58:51 · answer #9 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am a conservative and I answered it to the best of my ability. She deserves no less.
2007-03-21 15:04:24 · answer #10 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋