Anybody notice all the states attornies who where fired where human rights orientated?
Just an observation. Nepatism is more important than humanitarian needs, eh?
2007-03-21 07:35:38 · 6 answers · asked by dolphinparty13 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
good one............
2007-03-21 07:38:08 · answer #1 · answered by alex grant 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They were not "states attornies" and no "nepatism" was involved.
As for their human rights orientation, please update with details so you get a meaningful answer.
2007-03-21 14:39:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yep. That's one of the issues. But they were US Attorneys, who are federally prosecutors working for the Dept of Justice.
All of them also refused to prosecute or investigate based solely on the political affiliation of the defendant, and instead based their decisions neutrally on what the evidence showed.
2007-03-21 14:44:13 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Isn't everyone human rights orientated
2007-03-21 14:39:02 · answer #4 · answered by Jedi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
do you know the difference between a State's attorney and a federal prose cuter??? Research your question
2007-03-21 14:47:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
But the 93 that Clinton fired were all GOP and that is OK with you......hypocrisy at its best...
2007-03-21 14:40:57 · answer #6 · answered by Real Estate Para Legal 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋