Or any other democratic nominee. After this fiasco around not ending the war, I think it is very likely...and a moderate Republican nominee is going to make it even more tempting.
2007-03-21 07:23:16 · 11 answers · asked by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
For God's sake austingirl, Ron Paul is pushing you in the WRONG direction. I was thinking Ralph Nader.
2007-03-21 07:35:36 · update #1
That's the big question. Nader would definitely hurt Hillary in a few swing states like Florida and Ohio.
However, if she runs against Giuliani, McCain or Romney there will be many members of the Christian right who stay home.
2007-03-21 07:47:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It is very likely.
Last week Mark Shields of the Washington Post said Redpublicans if anything are loyal.
They will defend the likes of Giuliani and Gingrich in the name of GOP loyalty.
The Blues only have one common denominator. They are not RedsStaters. This makes them subject to division.
The Reds should promote Nader again to guarantee a victory in 08
Go big Red Go
2007-03-21 07:33:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
How lengthy do human beings interior the US obsess about the applicants in the previous they discuss guidelines. So what if women vote for Clinton etc what do they stand for? Why do they vote that way? applicants can charm to a a lot wider electorate than you propose ie JFK
2016-12-02 08:53:17 · answer #3 · answered by turnbough 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can see what you mean. I am a moderate who was pushed to the point of almost extreme liberalism with the rhetoric and actions of this administration. With that being said, Ron Paul really appeals to me.
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/html/Issues_fx.html
2007-03-21 07:29:56 · answer #4 · answered by ♥austingirl♥ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It depends. If Nader doesn't clean that suit soon, you'll need a gas mask to go to the rally.
2007-03-21 07:59:53 · answer #5 · answered by Charlie S 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, I can't think of a more blatently open socialist born in the states. It'd be hard to find another natural born American who could steal the few votes she'd manage to get.
2007-03-21 07:33:04 · answer #6 · answered by Michael E 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think if there is a third party candidate, it will probably be a conservative Republican, as they don't have any running right now.
2007-03-21 07:27:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Take votes? Do you think anyone who knows Hells politics and is not a Socialist would vote for her regardless?
2007-03-21 07:27:10 · answer #8 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
IF MICHAEL BLOOMBERG WERE TO RUN HE WOULD DEFINITELY TAKE VOTES AWAY FROM THE DEMOCRATS SINCE HE IS REALLY ONE HIMSELF. HE ONLY BECAME A REPUBLICAN SINCE HE WANTED TO RUN FOR MAYOR & WOULD HAVE LOST IN THE PRIMARIES IN 2001.
2007-03-21 07:29:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Likely.
Are you a member of Al Qaida?
2007-03-21 07:31:10 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋