English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For instance: Do you believe that the American public will discern that the Bush administration is trying to hide something when they refuse to participate in open government and appear before Congress under oath and with transcripts being kept?
This may be alot to do about nothing, but the response by the Bush administration, thus far, leads me to believe otherwise.

2007-03-21 06:57:57 · 8 answers · asked by Crystal Blue Persuasion 5 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Garrett, Don't you think that this supposed witchhunt could be ended now by allowing open questioning?
I don't like it when this representative government goes behind closed doors.
I can understand it when national security is involved, but this is not a national security issue.

2007-03-21 07:08:51 · update #1

8 answers

Not anymore.

Though I haven't given up hope most will come to their senses and at least start thinking for themselves, rather than just repeating whatever their been told by their leaders/spinners.

2007-03-21 07:01:00 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2 1

Bush is trying to make a stand against what is turning into rampant witch-hunting.
It has already been established that NO CRIME is involved, yet these pinheads want to continue this nonsense ad infinitum.
With the salivating complicit media to help them, the Dems are milking this to the last drop.
It will be interesting to see just how long reasonable people will tolerate this latest version of the Spanish Inquisition.
Dems beware! At the end of the day, the great silent majority may soon rise up and say 'off with YOUR heads'
Americans tend to be fair-minded people.
The congress is begining to look like it is persecuting - not investigating - this president.

2007-03-21 07:05:16 · answer #2 · answered by Garrett S 3 · 0 1

The straying from what the founders meant did not initiate with the present administration yet became area of transforming into and has exceeded off over the final century particularly. because of fact the US became a bigger usa all of it began being extra in touch in distant places affairs and that's one element the founding fathers did not opt to happen. extremely became very unrealistic of them and hypocritical additionally as they did sign treaties with France from the very initiate and we did ask for and get carry of the help of France for the time of the well-known conflict. Too many human beings think of that the replace is by technique of President Bush, liberals, conservatives and so on however the uncomplicated reality is that the persons did this to themselves so the government ought to offer them what they needed. The uninvolved, separate usa the founding fathers suggested they needed did not ever exist and that they began the distant places coverage edge of it; as transportation have been given swifter and extra reliable that's confusing if not impossible for a unfastened society to not be in touch in worldwide affairs. North Korea can do it yet might the shortcoming of freedom be worth it right here. as some distance because of fact the Oval place of work being extra dictator then ever formerly-you had ideal inspect the FDR White homestead-they did issues and pushed issues that have not been tried because. unsure the magnificent courtroom will back you up-no reason to watch for vacancies for you to boost the size and make certain we've a majority opinion that way. are you able to think of the uproar over it if President Bush had performed that? The erosion of the US has been sluggish and became a great deal speeded up by using WW1, the great melancholy and WW2. the great Society of JFK and LBJ rapidly became a gadget to purchase voter loyalty, Social risk-free practices became a similar element, this has been occurring for some years because of fact merely placed while a huge determination of persons become entitled to issues and the government provides it then the government beneficial factors potential. the biggest single blow to what the founding fathers predicted became the yankee Civil conflict (conflict of Northern Aggression) which destroyed the main examine against the potential of the federal government which became reliable states rights.

2016-11-27 19:57:54 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Did anyone notice that Clinton was NOT impeached for having an affair with a girl 39 years younger than himself? That he was indicted for LYING UNDER OATH! Clinton is a criminal, not for his ill-advised sexual escapades, but for committing perjury.
What collective wisdom do you have in mind? I don't see any collective wisdom. Americans are NOT WISE!
-

2007-03-21 07:09:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

When in doubt, see who is running around in circles trying to cover their own a$$.

I usually can't listen to Dubya for more than a few seconds without shutting him off. Today I listened for over 5 minutes while he babbled like a scared kid who is trying to convince daddy not to talk to his friends about where they were last night, or what they did.

2007-03-21 07:02:14 · answer #5 · answered by Joe M 4 · 1 0

I am hoping that the American public will see what it is that needs to be seen about Bush and his lies.

2007-03-21 07:01:08 · answer #6 · answered by hera 4 · 1 1

Yes, Bush is hiding the fact that he started Iraq war for oil!

Obama '08!

2007-03-21 07:01:18 · answer #7 · answered by Indy Plume 2 · 0 3

I don't. Their collective wisdom gave us Bill and Hillary.

2007-03-21 07:01:59 · answer #8 · answered by Matt 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers