Send fifty or more on their way. Eight certainly was not enough. Why not get rid of all of them? He needs to start fighting.
2007-03-21 06:41:54 · 6 answers · asked by Em E 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He already was fighting when he ordered the dismissal of attorneys who didn't prosecute his hit list of Democrats, and who persisted in prosecuting Republicans.
2007-03-21 06:46:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I agree. Why not fire all of the attorneys that were hired by Clinton asap. Clinton did it with impugnity so why not President Bush? Congress needs to step back and find a better bone to chew on. Maybe one with some meat on it. Or they could simply get back to doing the job they were voted in to do, legislate.
2007-03-21 13:47:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
He should only fire the ones that are not performing their assigned duties, like the 8 he already fired.
2007-03-21 13:45:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Why are we defending attorneys. Aren't they the scum of the earth.
2007-03-24 09:57:43 · answer #4 · answered by edward m 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sounds good to me!
2007-03-21 14:17:49 · answer #5 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He impeded federal investigations into corruption by firing assistant ag's going after some crooked rethugs and you support that, I guess corruption is a "rethuglican" thing I can't understand
2007-03-21 13:47:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 6⤋