2007-03-21 06:41:18 · 14 answers · asked by greg s 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
no. the bush admin. is the worst thing to happen to every living, breathing american and ally in the world. but as far as political leverage, then yes, bush's failures have afforded the dems a high vote of confidence.
bush found most of his success in ruining the name and reputation of our country abroad...
2007-03-21 06:45:56 · answer #1 · answered by Bret G 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the Bush administration is terrible on all accounts even if it makes the Democratic party look good, I'm sure the Democrats want what is good for all even if they don't have the office. I personally feel sorry for all the misguided Americans that voted for Bush, and I feel sorry for the rest of us that has had to put up with it. Stupidity don't benefit anyone.
2007-03-21 06:46:07 · answer #2 · answered by NANCY J 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
definite, that's "grant and insist". The summer time vacationing season is over and insist is down, inflicting expenses to bypass down. The iciness heating season is bobbing up in a pair months, and insist will bypass up. this would reason the fee to bypass up. And now there's a clean rfile out that OPEC has informally agreed to decrease production to hold oil expenses up. this would be drop in grant, and you could wager this would reason the fee to bypass up. It has no longer something to do with the U.S. politicians. Please clarify to us how the U.S. elections administration the international cost of oil? severe income? while did "earnings" become a 4-letter word? look into the earnings margins. If the oil businesses have been artificially inflating the fee of oil, their earnings margins would be way up. because it seems, on an analogous time as their income have long previous up, their earnings margins have remained the comparable. To all and sundry with 0.5 a concepts, this would inform you that their expenses have long previous way up too. call me one corporation which will prefer to maintain the income the comparable on an analogous time as spending extra money? in the event that they spend extra to run the corporation, they like a return on the investment. no longer something incorrect with that. And to declare the Republican occasion controls the fee is bull. In MN, the Democrats surpassed a regulation in 2001 that asserts a gasoline station can not sell gasoline under a definite cost, this is desperate on a daily basis by using the state's commerce branch. they say that's to guard the small self sufficient businesses from the "massive container" businesses, yet then turn around and superb the small independents while they decrease their cost to herald extra corporation. are you able to describe that? Sounds to me that the Democrats are those that are extremely controlling the fee.
2016-12-15 05:32:18 · answer #3 · answered by keetan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but I'm still not convinced we're going to see a Democratic President this go around.
IMO, the Dems have done a horrible job of asserting themselves and the policies they represent.
Nobody has taken a hard line stance on anything. They sway in the wind according to how they think voters will go.
And our Dem candidates suck. Hillary isn't going to be elected in this lifetime or the next.
Obama is new on the scene, has no name recognition, nor any political clout.
Edwards is and has been irrelevant.
Joe Biden is the co-pilot on Edwards' boat.
Gen. Wesley Clark hasn't made a hard push and that hacks me off cause he could pull it off.
2007-03-21 06:48:00 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. The best thing that happened to the Democratic party was the self destructive leadership that has blamed all their failures on the GOP. Not that the GOP is without fault, they have plenty, but tell me 5 things that Al Gore and John Kerry have accomplished ( in their professional carrers as politicians ) and I may have to give you a Kewpie doll.
2007-03-21 06:46:46 · answer #5 · answered by SteveA8 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it can be said he is one of the best things that has ever happened to the Democratic Party. Because of him we may experience another landslide like 1964 when Lyndon Johnson defeated Barry Goldwater and ushered more Democrats into Congressional seats.
2007-03-21 06:52:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well that depends on how they play their hand
thus far they have not been to good at the game
they need to seize this opportunity and do what the people
asked of them last November when they were elected.
They are to divided ed and they need to find some one that
can win the 2008 election hands down , i say lets get
(Arnold) The Terminator he may have the title of a Republican but he is truly a (Kennedy at hart) and would win
hands down for (Arnold) has the ability to bring both sides
together as one , but first the pip law needs to be changed.
2007-03-21 06:48:39 · answer #7 · answered by RONBO 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes! President Bush could bring all the troops from all over the world back to the USA, bring down water from the skies and cure all of the droughts around the world, cure world hunger and sew up the ozone layer and Libs would still hate him because he is a conservative Republican. I have such a good time watching congress squirm!!!!
2007-03-21 07:11:24 · answer #8 · answered by Princess of the Realm 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That all depends.. if Bush can get the troops out by 2008 it will be the worst disaster for the Democrats in history.
2007-03-21 06:43:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
No...thousands of people are dying in Iraq and we are possibly going into ww3 so Bush i'snt good for anyone
2007-03-21 06:45:01 · answer #10 · answered by zed10096 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋