They didn't have any problem going out of their way to find a way to impeach Clinton. Why can't we put Bush under oath and see if we can catch him in a lie ? Perhaps because Republicans are hypocrites ? I guess they will tell me that I should be concerned about the welfare of the country. That we shouldn't become distracted by investigations. Yeah, they will try to tell me that their above trying to take down a President just because they didn't like him.
2007-03-21 06:31:08 · 13 answers · asked by Count Acumen 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The Rightists see truth as anything that fits their perception of the world.
Anything,like reality,that intrudes into that perception is labeled as an attack on innocent people.
They see nothing wrong in mounting vicious attacks on their opponents with very little evidence of wrongdoing,but howl martyrdom when the criminality of their leaders is laid bare.
Modern Rightist philosophy is one of hypocrisy,fear and loathing.
2007-03-21 06:40:26 · answer #1 · answered by Zapatta McFrench 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, in spite of the fact that Bush has violated both the Geneva Convention and the War Crimes Act, the Republicans continue to defend him.
Hypocrites-R-Us is going to be the slogan of the GOP in the 2008 Party Convention.
2007-03-21 20:09:01 · answer #2 · answered by barringtonbreathesagain 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I see your point but you have to put a stop to it somewhere. First the democrats bought down Nixon with Watergate then they tried to bring down Reagan with Iran Contra then the Republicans saw payback with Clinton now we are on to Bush right now it is Democrats 3 Republicans 1 do you see where this is going?
2007-03-21 06:41:30 · answer #3 · answered by Ynot! 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
so that you're pleased with boycotts yet no longer sit-ins in help? or you're pleased with sit-ins in help yet no longer boycotts? we are talking about persons. they have countless aims and generalizing to an complete celebration is stupid. That stated, all of us who boycotts and helps is of their rights. it truly isn't any longer hypocrisy. Your pretense that that's stupid, because there have been diverse causes for the help and boycotts. It also seems that you (and also you aren't from now on on my own) are very wondered about what freedom of speech is. that is our suitable as in accordance to the structure to talk freely while not having the authorities get in contact. It has no longer some thing to do with civilians who vote down a area, boycott, or sit in to help. surely no longer some thing. you're blending up causes and generalizing very carelessly. Did you propose to attempt this?
2016-12-02 08:51:00 · answer #4 · answered by turnbough 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not hypocrisy really - it's a single minded effort to make this country and the world dance to their tune in spite of the laws. Thankfully the people are having none of it.
2007-03-21 06:37:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
To quote my answer from less than 30 minutes ago:
Yeah, it's a real shame that the people that claim to be adults running congress feel justified to play the revenge game. Next, you'll be hearing, "Nanny Nanny Boo Boo"
2007-03-21 06:36:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
perhaps it is because Bush is not a sexual deviant who is going to sexually harass people, nor get involved in shady land deals.
Why do you defend that man for so many crimes?
2007-03-21 06:43:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We caught Clinton in a lie after,AFTER, we had a crime. Find a crime first.
2007-03-21 06:44:08 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This isn't payback sonny! Growup!
2007-03-21 06:35:40 · answer #9 · answered by LittleLamb 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
everyone always find ways to be upset and such i've found...
Can't we all just get along?
2007-03-21 06:35:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋