Will the Bush witchunt continue till he leaves office?

Question

With the latest flap about the firing of 8 US attorney, Clinton fired 93 some of them investigating him and his friends no fanfair no big deal by the media, typical liberals will say Clinton did not do it during the middle of his term pleeease! (Irrelavant) they can be fired at the whim of the president.

If democrats say there is no media bias I think I will hurl. I think this a testament to the fallacy of appeasement. Here we have a president that is polite and will not say bad things about democrats and gets attack on a daily basis there is a lesson to be learn here.

Outta jail came back with irrelevant response typical liberal as for map stop listening to so much right wing radio if I made a false statement point it out. All Bush said if you are againts what our forces are trying to accomplish in Iraq you are for the terroist sounds accurate to me.

apparently reading is a required skill for some of you Clinton fired many of his Attoneys for political reasons midterm is irrelevant

Answer 1

I think it will. I have written to my Representatives to ensure they know my thoughts on their responsibility to support the President that I voted for.

Answer 2

The democrats are paper tigers. Always on the offense, always critical, and without any real plan. Their ONLY chance of having the illusion of knowing what they're doing is by attacking the policies of a president that they all supported in the days following the 911 attacks. It should be no wonder to people that four and a half months after the 2006 mid term elections that the democrats have done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about all the causes they championed and issues they created! So much for stem cell research, pulling out of Iraq, universal health care, and all of the other things they ran their campaign on! Could it be that democrats only care about getting back into power after all?????

Answer 3

Witch hunt...LOL

Every president (Clinton, Bush Sr., Reagan, etc. etc.) does a "house cleaning" at the start of their term. That's common and expected. These current firings are politically-based.

These attornies were fired because they didn't toe the party line; the administration says it's because of "poor performance," but every performance evaluation they received was excellent.

And Bush doesn't say bad things about Democrats? Where have you been? Oh, you mean since we came into power; suddenly he wants to be bipartisan.

Answer 4

I've heard, almost verbatim, these same comments on right wing radio radio. If you're going to be an apologist then come up with something better than "Clinton fired 93".

As for Bush being polite, give me a ******* break. The week before the election, in speech after speech, he equated democrats with terrorists.

Answer 5

Witch hunt? That's hilarious. The Senate just voted 94-2(with 49 Republicans) to repeal the part of Bush's Patriot Act that gave him the power no other president has had-to fire attorneys MIDTERM(not at the beginning as Clinton and Reagan did) as well as the power to appoint without Senate approval. The Senate Judiciary(10 Dems, 9 Repubs) voted unanimously to serve subpoenas. That doesn't seem like partisan politics to me. It's a balance of power issue and Republicans aren't happy either. Nixon took "executive power" to the Supreme Court and we know that led to his resignation. Can't wait to see Bush gamble.

Answer 6

I think the country will be very ready to move on from Bush. Frankly, I think lots of truths will be revealed from the war and what the Clinton's knew and her decision to back such an ill advised war when she had more information than any '2 year' president.

I also believe he wasn't expecting such a hard term. I think he wanted to get his feet wet and got them soaked. His terms were way above his head.

He will be pardoned because of his mental capabilities as a 'yellow bus' student. (no punt intended for the other students on the bus.)

And for the life of Dixie Hill!!!! Will SOMEONE take down that dayum Hillary ad!? It's making me SICK!

Answer 7

It's 5 years late and should have started with Kathleen Harris!

In 2004, the Bush administration distributed fake news reports touting its proposed Medicare prescription drug law to numerous news networks in an attempt to gain support for the law. On May 19, 2004 , the GAO issued a report that Bush had violated laws prohibiting use of federal money for propaganda and the unauthorized use of federal funds.

In June of 2002, President Bush detained Jose Padilla, an American citizen, denying him due process and attempting to hold him indefinitely in a military prison without trial or access to a lawyer. He was held illegally, and in direct violation of Constitutional provision regarding due process, until the Supreme Court intervened in 2004, forcing the Bush administration to present evidence in a court of law or release Padilla.

In July of 2002, it was revealed that Bush had illegally diverted $700 million from funds appropriated for Afghanistan , using the money for Iraq invasion planning. This unauthorized, illegal use of funds was justified by Bush supporters in Washington since the $700 million was "small compared with the overall spending bills." This also violated sections of the supplemental bill explicitly stating that the president must inform Congress of the uses for the allocated money.

In January of 2005, Bush's administration illegally paid conservative pundit Armstrong Williams $241,000 of federal funds to publicly support the No Child Left Behind law. The GAO issued a report that this use of federal funds, like the Medicare scandal before it, was illegal.

Answer 8

Since the Clinton Witch Hunt lasted from 1992-2000, I'd say no.

Answer 9

I easily have a chum who's sister is interior the secret provider, and he or she provides risk-free practices for many ex prestidents, and their spouses. Your assumtion which you got here across some huge secret and that the present presidents risk-free practices is finally a particular difficulty subsequently of something he has achieved as president is pathetic. as some distance because of the fact the excrement ingredient is going, that's elementary prepare to disclaim foriegn intelligence amenities get entry to to any awareness of our presidents actual situation, illnesses, medicine or something that should point a weak spot they could make the main. that is purely quite new because of the fact the scientific advances to allow it are quite new to maximum foriegn agencies to three volume. Your fact, "that is oftentimes generic" is a solid indicator of what's incorrect with human beings such as you and your get entry to to so observed as innovations materials which includes wikipedia and youtube instead of any real source.

Answer 10

The Dems special interest groups want to get their projects going so the sooner they oust Bush the better (impeachers). AND, all the Bush bashing and conspiracy theories.

It won't stop either if another Repub. gets into office.

It's a one way ticket for the Dems, they never do anything questionable according to all Dems and libs.

Answer 11

It will continue long after. It is an attempt to legitamize Bill Clinton, by making Bush look "worse than Clinton". If that succeeds it will make Hilary, and other Dems look "good".
-