Is our society attempting to be re-engineerd gay? I'm arguing on another forum Against whats below?

Question

The other structural change is to allow gay couples to adopt heterosexual children. Heterosexual children need heterosexual role models. To raise them in a gay environment is child abuse. When these children are adults, I hope they sue governments for millions.

The ultimate goal is to redefine the family so potentially it could include government minders raising test tube babies in group homes.

As I have said before, I am in favor of a separate and equal marital institution for homosexuals if that's what they want. I have nothing against gays who lead responsible private lives. My beef is with the Rockefeller-funded activists who use homosexuality to sabotage society in advance of totalitarian government.

These activists admit they want to change the "hetero-normative" nature of society. Is 96% of society going March to the Beat of 4% like it did in the USSR

I'm just giving you a chance to weigh in, I don't believe this non sense but it is funny

HEY JUST TOO IS READING SOMETHING YOU DO, I CLEARLY STATED I AM ARGUING ON ANOTHER FORUM AGAINST WHATS BELOW...........

Answer 1

Children up for adoption need loving parents. The gender and sexual orientation of the parents should NOT enter into the equation.

Straight parents raise children that turn out to be LGBT every day. LGBT parents raise children that turn out to be straight every day. More than 90% of all LGBT people came from straight parents.

To me, the worst thing that can happen with LGBT parents is that the child would learn additional tolerance, and the importance of giving equal rights to all. This is a tremendously good thing.

Answer 2

1)If Heterosexual children need heterosexual role models, what kind of role models do homosexual children need?
Where the heck do you think homosexual children come from?

MY PARENTS ARE HETEROSEXUAL...But I'm Homosexual.
You're logic is in a completely other dimension on this one!

2) The "Family" has ALWAYS been redefined throughout history!
Wake up and smell the foster care system, dude...let me tell ya...it STINKS!

3) We already know from the Fourteenth Amendment that "Separate but equal is NEVER equal."
Try learning about the law, a little national history and what it means to DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION!

4) The ONLY one I see trying to "re-define" anything here is YOU.
You're twisting facts to suit your personal views and needs. You wouldn't know the "Truth" if it came up and bit your nose off!

Until you know what you're talking about, I suggest you keep your MOUTH SHUT and your EYES and EARS OPEN...while you're at it...a few MIND OPENING EXERCISES wouldn't hurt either.

Answer 3

In a perfect world, gay parents would raise gay kids, etc. But not enough straight, married couples are willing to take on older kids. It's better that they be raised by someone who loves them, including gays, instead of living in an institution. Ironic that gay couples apparently love kids more than straight couples, and that gays place a higher value on the institution of marriage than straights.

Answer 4

"To raise them in a gay environment is child abuse." It's sad that anyone would even think something like that. Since we have to overcome many more obstacles to have children than our heterosexual counterparts, we most certainly would make more responsible, supportive and loving parents. I don't think it's child abuse, I'd call it an extremely lucky child to have gay parents.

Answer 5

i think of criminal partnerships might desire to be regulated by using the state, and could be the two obtainable to right this moment human beings and gay human beings. "Marriage" as traditionally conceived of, even although, has all varieties of non secular meanings, and rightly or wrongly, many non secular human beings interpret their holy scriptures as being strongly anti-gay. So i think of we would desire to consistently make "marriage" a strictly non secular ceremony, completely separated from how the political state enforces regulations concerning adoption, belongings inheritance, the main magnificent to bypass on your companion interior the well-being center, and so on. and so on. Then we would desire to consistently permit the various non secular communities define marriage as they'll -- the Catholics one way, the various denominations of Jews yet in a distinctive way, the various Muslim communities yet in a distinctive way, the Hindus and Buddhists yet yet in a distinctive way, and perhaps the gay and anti-gay Episcopalians 2 extra techniques. this way we would sidestep "legalizing gay marriage "' -- an entire scandal to a pair conservative non secular human beings, and one that is probable to deliver them on the warpath, at a great value to society. yet we would desire to consistently be certain that the political state thoroughly helps gay and right this moment civil unions, as a manner to guarantee equivalent criminal rights to all, as in step with the US shape and the assertion of Independence. the reason against "gay marriage," although, is an identical reason it is at the back of the clever rule of not waving a purple cape in front of an indignant bull. you do not opt to goad the bull into violent action; merely leave the bull on my own.

Answer 6

i know how to set the time on my vcr does that qualify me to answer engineering questions

Answer 7

The nonsense would be laughable if it wasn't so sad.

Answer 8

OMG you are making me laugh so hard!