Alright! I thought the 21st Bond movie was kick awesome, I kind of expected a sequel since Casino Royale did so well in the box office. I also hope that they keep Daniel Craig, he was a way better than the rest of the Bonds. Bond 22: A definite must see.
2007-03-21 05:44:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by rowdyfoudy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have read all of the Ian Fleming books and seen most of the movies. (I have to admit that I didn't see some of the Roger Moore ones). I am a Bond purist, that is I go strictly by the books. Although David Craig is not what is described in the books (he's blond), he is a return to the book Bond and early Sean Connery Bond, in that he is lean and mean. He doesn't mind getting dirty and nasty. This is what has been missing from the series. Most of the Bonds have been so smooth, they;'re greasy. Too good to get their clothes dirty. Too reliant on gadgets. I like the return of the real Bond, dirty, mean and nasty.
2007-03-21 09:34:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jon Buquor 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Loved the movie by far the best Bond movie yet.. Craig nailed the part .. looking forward to the 2nd one just got the DVD & liked the extras on it too
also just read in the GOSSIP colomun that Sean Connery wants to play Bonds father in the upcoming one ??
2007-03-21 05:49:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by muffett1 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm a Bond purist, so I was disappointed in the never-ending game of poker and overall lack of the bigtime action and gadgets that I normally come to expect in my Bond films. But I will say that it was really good, and I will grudgingly admit that Daniel Craig was a serviceable Bond, albeit he was no Pierce Brosnan(who personifies what the smooth Bond should be)
2007-03-21 06:14:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I thought it was just marginally better than the past couple of Bond movies (which were awful). Daniel Craig is a much better Bond than the last guy, though.
2007-03-21 05:46:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by earthtojoe 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it's an excellent movie, even if the action isn't as epic or abundant as other Bond movies. There's no supervillain on the verge of destroying the world/crushing the economy of the Western World/killing off mankind from space/plotting a deadly world war by pitting superpowers against each other.
It's still a nice Bond movie. I liked it.
2007-03-21 05:45:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Master Strategist 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no longer inevitably to comprehend it, yet to savour it. They touch down on numerous Daniel Craig's Bond background so Skyfall makes on line casino and Solace look plenty cooler. My boyfriend had in no way seen a single Bond movie until eventually I made him watch some from each and every era. He says Daniel Craig's is terrific, I agree. i think of you will possibly get excitement from it extra in case you observed the 1st 2.
2016-10-02 12:33:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I saw Casino Royale, and it was really good, better than Die Another Day; Daniel Craig was great, but I don't think the 'card-game' worked that much for me. We now know how he 'started' out as a double O.
2007-03-21 06:26:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah I did! But it was boring the same crap all over again. Plus I think that it didn't have lots of action as the old ones.
2007-03-21 05:49:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by ♥Complicated-World♥ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
no desire
2007-03-21 05:39:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by moonlillies 3
·
0⤊
0⤋