when their democratic leaders come back from "peace" talks missing their heads??
2007-03-21 04:23:45 · 15 answers · asked by panthrchic 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I don't know, just a thought....I mean, nothing else seems to be convincing enough.
2007-03-21 04:24:35 · update #1
No, they would just claim a small band of masked Pro-war protestors flew over there and did the job to make the anti-war movement look bad.
2007-03-21 04:34:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
It isn't the democratic leaders who come back from peace talks missing their heads. Or at any rate, dead.
It's the 60,000 or so Iraqis, most of them innocent civilians going about their daily business, not to mention the 3,000 or so US troops and several hundred British and other nationalities. And you can add to that the figures of those killed in Afghanistan, and other 'hot spots' around the world.
When will the pro-war people get the point?
2007-03-21 11:49:39 · answer #2 · answered by squeaky guinea pig 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What point? That the war is a huge blunder and the troops are dying for Iraq not the US?
Iraq had nothing to do with 911. The lies and the fear tactics don't work, never worked on some of us.
Now go back to the Game Boy and let the adults converse.
2007-03-21 11:31:31 · answer #3 · answered by kenny J 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
What happens when the leaders come back with their heads attached...then are you guilty of overstating the issue and fear mongering to make a point. Stop generating fear to get your agenda done...people are tired and feel tricked by you and other BUSH types. You misinformed the public and your party is still sinking in the polls. Pants on Fire.
2007-03-21 11:31:41 · answer #4 · answered by Laughing Man Copycat 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.
Liberals do not know how to defend a nation.
2007-03-21 11:29:22 · answer #5 · answered by SnowWebster2 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Would you denounce Bush if you knew for a fact that he PURPOSEFULLY LIED about the situation in Iraq prior to our committing troops
I didn't think so
2007-03-21 11:39:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't know. Will years of a failing war finally make you get the point?
2007-03-21 11:32:53 · answer #7 · answered by capu 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
That will never happen. What point were you hoping that they get?
Will conservatives get the point after thier sons and daughters come back from war in boxes missing THIER heads?
2007-03-21 11:27:34 · answer #8 · answered by Louis G 6 · 5⤊ 3⤋
That is the most insightful thing I haver read or heard or seen come from the mind of a conservative.
2007-03-21 11:28:51 · answer #9 · answered by Zapatta McFrench 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
We wouldn't even need the libs-if more chickenhawk neo-cons volunteered to fight-unfortunately Bush-Cheney-Rove-Limbaugh-Hannity- O'reilly-etc. etc (a lil bit o cowardidace)
2007-03-21 11:31:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋