I too remember her outrageous statements about 'gun control' .
I also remember Rosie speaking in several different venues stating that nobody should have the right to own a gun. . . . .. . . . . . . .. and then. . . .. . . BAMMMM !!! .. . . Her bodyguards got caught carrying them on HER REQUEST !!!
Apparently a perfect example of the crazy elitist attitude whereby laws and the constitution should only be applied to us 'little people' !!! And then only when they've changed the constitution according to their personal notions and whims !!!
2007-03-21 04:41:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
With a body like hers I can't imagine that she has only one bodyguard. I think she might need a few to cover the extra ground.
2007-03-21 11:24:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Centurion529 4
·
5⤊
0⤋
Probable it would be just like a liberal to force people to give up guns used for personal protection then make an exception for themselves.
2007-03-21 11:25:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mother 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
Yeah, in case Rosie attacks him
2007-03-21 11:22:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by biscuitperifrank 5
·
10⤊
0⤋
A tranquilizer gun... In case she breaks her leash and attacks a group of people he can than take her out.
2007-03-21 11:23:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dog Lover 7
·
6⤊
0⤋
Yeah. That's what body guards usually carry. It's part of the job.
What's your point?
2007-03-21 13:30:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Rosie has a body guard? LOL is it her wife?
2007-03-21 11:25:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jahpson 5
·
6⤊
0⤋
Gee, I can't imagine why she would need a bodyguard. (sarcasm)
2007-03-21 11:32:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I think he turned it in for a sock filled with quarters.
2007-03-21 11:23:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Laughing Man Copycat 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Doughnuts and candy would be better. Then if she attacks him he can offer her FOOD
2007-03-21 11:25:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋