English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The kids father is a rich lawyer. With 100s of wildlife & law enforcement officials involved in the search it must have cost 10s of thousands of dollars.

2007-03-21 04:17:33 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

8 answers

I think the burden of said expenses should lie on the parents. If anything they should be charged with what Indiana refers to as "Neglect of a De pendant". ***A Class D Felony***

If the parents make a living that is higher than the mass majority in the county they live in...then their monetary burden should be higher than typical working class people like ourselves.

Mind you my comment is insensitive, but true since the wealthy are granted more rights than the poor. (This is a general standard and a valid one at that)

The parents are wrong...and should bear the burden. In my own town if I call the Fire Department I will receive a bill for $500.00 regardless of how I feel about it. The kid left the group on his own. If this was a poor minority in the city I seriously doubt a big rescue search would be made.

How sad...

and a note to the "rescuer"...I don't beleive that garbage about how priorities are the same for everyone. I could site a number of different cases where "class" played a role in someone's life saving events versus a regular working class citizen.

We all read the papers and know its a reality! Mind you a SICK reality. Stupid rich people that don't raise their kids right should get a piece of the bill that the "REAL" taxes payers deal with. Watch the lost little boy get older and get a DUI and his rich mommy and daddy find a technicality to get him out of it by politicals means.

Harsh reality!

2007-03-21 05:54:59 · answer #1 · answered by jose_jara2 1 · 1 1

Of course!!!

It is the responsibility of such civic officers to help ALL people in dangerous situations. Rich or poor, citizen or not, white or black.

That is like saying that if someone is rich, they should have to pay for their own firemen just in case their house catches on fire.

Absolutely ridiculous question.

2007-03-21 11:31:57 · answer #2 · answered by Raising6Ducklings! 6 · 1 0

Being a Search & Rescuer myself, we don't care if you have money or if your the poorest person alive, many rescurers do it free. If your butt was lost and someone put a price tag on you I bet you would be a singing a different tune.

2007-03-21 13:46:09 · answer #3 · answered by Boomrat 6 · 0 0

I understand what ur saying but as taxpayers law and rescue are there to help everyone. And how ironic that a volunteer found him.

2007-03-21 12:11:42 · answer #4 · answered by luminous 7 · 0 0

They found him, great. Now make his parents pay. How stupid can a boy scout be ? They are supposed to know North from South and so on.

Warm his bottom.

2007-03-21 11:31:59 · answer #5 · answered by radar 4 · 0 1

No, I think the parents should take responsibility for it. The child left the group on his own.

2007-03-21 11:21:38 · answer #6 · answered by MM from NH 1 · 0 1

they will send him a bill, but we as tax payers pay for everybody to use those services and yes that includes the rich,, they pay more in property tax,,you should ask ,, should the state pay for woman in prison to have abortions,, it is done in everystate and we pay for it

2007-03-21 11:53:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

i'd bet more like 100's of 1000's of dollars

2007-03-21 11:32:29 · answer #8 · answered by Well... 1 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers