The Warren Court extended voting rights and protected the rights of the accused?

Question

true or false?

Answer 1

TRUE

The Warren Court (1953–1969) made a number of alternately celebrated and controversial rulings expanding the application of the Constitution to civil liberties, leading a renaissance in substantive due process. It held that segregation was unconstitutional (Brown v. Board of Education), that the Constitution protects a general right to privacy (Griswold v. Connecticut), that schools cannot have official prayer (Engel v. Vitale) or mandatory Bible readings (Abington School District v. Schempp), dramatically increased the scope of the doctrine of incorporation (Mapp v. Ohio; Miranda v. Arizona), read an equal protection clause into the Fifth Amendment (Bolling v. Sharpe), held that the states may not apportion a chamber of their legislatures in the manner in which the United States Senate is apportioned (Reynolds v. Sims), and held that the Constitution grants the right of retaining a court appointed attorney for those too indigent to pay for one (Gideon v. Wainwright).

Answer 2

That statement us true.
Amendment 15
Amendemnt 19
Amendment 24
Amendment 26

Answer 3

Warren Co where??

There is one in OH that I know about...

Last time I checked...in the US if you are ACCUSED you are still innocent until it is PROVEN that you are guilty....