will they play in the match against SRILANKA?
2007-03-21 03:51:03 · 13 answers · asked by srinu710 4 in Sports ➔ Cricket
I was asking the same question to myself.
They are not given chance even against Bermuda.
So I don't think they will play against Srilanka.
Irfan need not be used for batting.Already we have a strong batting lineup.He should concentrate only on bowling.
I think Zaheer and Agarkar should be replaced.
Zaheer last time gave 15 runs in the first over itself in the final match.
At least they should have tried them against Bermuda.
2007-03-21 08:22:24 · answer #1 · answered by EagerBeaver 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely Sreesanth would have been included in the playing team since beginning, always we can see, in abroad Sreesanth is more succesful than agarkar. No need of including Pathan now since he is not come upto his previous match winning position. So better to keep him until the failure of Saheer Munaf Sreesanth or Kumble. Another important change have to be done for Karthik (could have done at the beginning ahead of Sehwag or even now since Sehwag is not capable of scoring against a good team)
Otherwise definitely India will definitely miss the best part of this world cup.
2007-03-22 03:49:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not sure about Sreesanth, but Pathan could definitely be a better batting option when compared to the misfiring Agarkar. Unless india gets to the super league, I do not see any chance of Sreesanth playing. The other bowlers (Zaheer and Munaf) are bowling alright and if Pathan is brought in instead of Agarkar, there is no place for Sreesanth
2007-03-21 11:18:30 · answer #3 · answered by the truth 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would definitely play Srisanth against srilanka in place of Agarkar. I'm sure Irfan can score more runs than srisanth but we need a bowler who is capable of taking some wickets. Having said that I also know that the selectors will retain Agarkar because he is all rounder and took a couple of wickets in the match against Bermuda.
2007-03-21 11:51:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell knows. In the Indian team, i see no point of not letting them play. Instead, the great "Chappell" is letting the "culprit" Agarkar to play, who is costing India great runs at the end of each over! Out of minds, they are! All these makes me do a wish, to kick that Chappel's butt! They must play against Sri Lanka, or else if that CULPRIT gives runs, he is on my heat list.
2007-03-21 11:16:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Answer is simple and stright forward, because team management thought Zaheer khan and Ajit Agarkar are better than them. It is another matter who is actually better. I think one of them will replace Ajit Agarkar for match against Srilanka.
2007-03-21 12:47:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anubhav 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do not think whether they play against Sri Lanka. Since Sri Lanka are a strong Team, team management would not like to change the winning combination.
2007-03-21 10:55:45 · answer #7 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Instead of Ajit Agarkar one of them must play.They should have been included against Bermuda itself.
2007-03-21 11:10:27 · answer #8 · answered by karikalan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Take robin uthappa out and put in anil kumble or irfan pathan.
2007-03-21 12:08:50 · answer #9 · answered by turbanator 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
india ko pathan aur shreesanth par bharosa nahi tha, isliye unhe disselect kiya.
2007-03-21 15:10:42 · answer #10 · answered by akash s 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋