http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070321/ap_on_re_af/somalia
So Clinton did his job successfully???
2007-03-21 03:27:57 · 11 answers · asked by Samm 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I did not blame Clinton for this. I am just saying that Liberals keep claiming that it was world peace in his terms and this proves they are WRONG.
2007-03-21 03:33:40 · update #1
so solving a problem takes time, right? Even Clinton left WH 7 years ago and Somalia is still a mess.
2007-03-21 03:35:50 · update #2
Liberals are cowards....ignorant cowards, they do not care if the world is overrun by evil, all they care about is getting back in power so they can promote their sick agenda,you can bet our enemies fight on hoping liberals win the election...fact is that is why they accept huge casualties as our boys kick their ***.DONIEB49 what is your point most liberals are cowards! like you.
2007-03-21 03:39:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
With all the hungry ghost out there in planet of apes.
Why not be the first one to sign up and reach out to extend them a helping hands in planet of apes.
Make sure the dead Mummy with two hands stretching out blindly searching the way back to the gravesyards do not bring you along too in planet of apes.
2007-03-21 10:48:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell yeah Clinton did his job.
The job of the Commander in Chief is not to keep the U.S. in a state of continual warfare.
The job of the Commander in Chief is to be smart and pull our troops out when there is no clear achievable mission and it is somebody's else's fight in the first place. Discretion is the better part of valour.
Did you see the Black Hawk doc? Everybody, literally everybody, in that country has an assault weapon. What would you have done, left our troops there indefinitely and tried to rebuild that nation too?
Ethiopia has intervened there and the Islamists are on the run.
That is fine, we should support Ethiopia's efforts, but let them do the fighting for a change.
2007-03-21 11:01:48 · answer #3 · answered by celticexpress 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Boy. We can bash Bush all day and that's okay. We can bash Bush without claiming sources, and that's just dandy. All we need is an arsenal of cuss words and a bad attitude. But let us site a source with a legitimate claim against a liberal and, well, we're just stupid poo-heads.
2007-03-21 10:40:55 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Everything is Clinton's fault, right? It doesn't matter that the motherfvcker has been out of office for going on 7 years, all these problems are obviously Clintonian problems, and the GOP/Bushies could never EVAR screw things up, right?
Oh wait, there's a civil war in Iraq, our government is telling us it can jail and torture people on the Executive's whim, and Bush tells us he can ignore laws just by attaching a "signing statement"..
2007-03-21 10:32:05 · answer #5 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Looks like they're not killing enough insurgents. Why is it any time a muslim is involved there has to be an atrocity?
2007-03-21 10:40:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
"Those who hate and fight must stop themsevles, otherwise it is not stopped."
Apply that to the Shiite-Sunni Civil War that we insist on getting in the middle of.
I would urge the African Union to handle it rather than us. We tried it already.
2007-03-21 10:52:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not anymore than Bush 41,who was the one who sent our troops there in the last month of his presidency.Another example of a Bush leaving his mess for somebody else to try and clean up,
2007-03-21 10:33:45 · answer #8 · answered by Zapatta McFrench 5 · 1⤊ 5⤋
So you think that because an issue is resolved, it is resolved permanently?
Perhaps things fell apart because Bush has concentrated solely on Iraq for the entirety of his Presidency, mmmmm?
2007-03-21 10:33:23 · answer #9 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
America won't help Somalia. There is no oil there.
2007-03-21 10:39:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋