If a person does something they know is wrong, which is actually a person trying to control the issue of "right", how is it that "consequences" can't be controlled or stopped? Even if someone is displeased and communicates to the person that has chosen to "mess up" that communication alone IS a consequence and in the case of a healthy person should trigger remorse.
After all, nobody has ever been able to control consequences try as they may for as long as they may. So, rebellion against "good" always causes consequences. It makes sense then to conclude people who do this all day long are malnourished in discipline and are possibly surrounded by people who don't give a rip for them... people who ignore behavior or try to cover it up for the person are usually rebellious themselves... what are your thoughts?
2007-03-21
00:05:24
·
2 answers
·
asked by
GoodQuestion
6
in
Social Science
➔ Psychology