English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

According to the BNP 2001 general election manifesto, “native Britons”, who they claim can only be white, would be given priority in the job market. “Non-whites” would instantly become second class citizens in Britain.

Any black person who commits a crime would also be thrown out of the country, even those who were born here.

Mixed race relationships would be outlawed.

Privately, the BNP leaders have continued to air their real political views. “All black people will be repatriated, even if they were born here”, BNP leader Nick Griffin told Wales on Sunday in 1996. “We must preserve the white race, because it has been responsible for all the good things in civilisation”.

According to party number two, Tony Lecomber, the preservation of the white race can be done through a racial eugenic programme.

The BNP supported ethnic cleansing in the Kosovan crisis. “The Serbs’ real crime isn’t the harshness with which they have expelled so many of the Albanian Muslims who h

2007-03-20 22:31:10 · 18 answers · asked by jagga j 1 in Politics & Government Politics

with which they have expelled so many of the Albanian Muslims who having become the majority in the Kosovan heart of Serbia by a mixture of immigration, a high birth rate, and low level ethnic cleansing of the native Serbs… No! The real crime in the eyes of the powerful advocates of a multi-racial New World Order is for any people to demand the right to preserve their own identity and freedom”.

The BNP says they have no truck with “race hate”. Another outrageous lie. The jokes, caricatures, cartoons and articles depict black people as stupid, criminally minded and ugly. Time and again, BNP publications talk about the genetic superiority of the white race.

Several BNP members have put this racism into practice:

Former National Organiser Richard Edmonds was convicted for his part in a vicious bottle attack on a mixed race couple in a pub in East London 1993

BNP supporter Stuart Kerr was sentenced to 12 years imprisonment for firebombing an Asian shop in Chichester, Sussex

2007-03-20 22:31:30 · update #1

BNP leader Nick Griffin was convicted of incitement to racial hatred in April 1998


London nail bomber: David Copeland
The BNP organiser for Waltham Forest, Alan Gould, was convicted of racially abusing people in a pub in 2000

Former BNP member David Copeland was sentenced to six life sentences after planting bombs in London. He wanted to start a race war.

On other occasions, the BNP has glorified racist attacks. In 1991, the BNP newspaper gloated after several BNP supporters stabbed an African immigrant at London Bridge station. The victim had his “kidney surgically removed”, the paper boasted. In the same year, the BNP leadership whipped up a racist riot in Bermondsey, London, and led an attack on an anti-racist meeting that was protesting against the BNP headquaters in Welling. Thirteen people needed hospital treatment.

A BNP presence has almost always culminated in “race hate”. When Derek Beackon was elected as a BNP councillor in Millwall, racist attacks in the

2007-03-20 22:31:59 · update #2

in the area soared by 300%

2007-03-20 22:32:18 · update #3

18 answers

Everything you say is absolutely correct jagga j.

I would add that its not only non-white minorities that would suffer if we were ever unfortunate enough to have a BNP government.

The vast majority of people in the UK would suffer in their pockets. The BNP are an anti-capitalist, high taxation party (despite their stated aim to lower tax - their figures just don't add up).

A major domestic policy of the BNP is to increase shared ownership and establish worker co-operatives. That sounds like a very anti-capitalist aim to me. Where would the money to implement these measures come from? Increased taxes, that's where.

The BNP proposes funding public spending increases and tax cuts by cutting foreign aid. The high cost of their plans to repatriate ethnic minorities and their anti-globalisation stance which would stifle UK business, however, would mean massive tax rises, not cuts, and would completely subsume any money they could save through the highly unethical measure of cutting foreign aid.

They also propose increasing government funding to "encourage women to stay home and nurture their family". I.e they believe that a "woman's place is in the home", so they would spend yet more money gained from increased taxation in an attempt to keep women out of the work place and to prevent them earning money for themselves without dependency on a man. How any woman could be fooled into voting for this kind of chauvinistic policy is beyond me.

The BNP would increase defence spending, again the money would have to come from higher taxes, no matter what they claim. They also plan to reintroduce compulsory national service for all and to deny some civil rights, including the right to vote to those who refuse to perform this service. As well as being a violation of our freedom and human rights, this would also cost money that would have to come from taxation.

They also propose that all who complete national service are to maintain a standard-issue military assault rifle and ammunition in their home, giving lunatic gunmen a licence to repeat massacres like Dunblane.

One more example of their ludicrous and highly costly policies, is their proposal for the reunification of the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland into what they call a "federation of the nations of the British Isles". Since the Irish are understandably very much against this, there is only one way they could implement the measure - declare war on the Republic of Ireland.

Anyone who votes for the BNP is voting for social and economic disaster in the UK.

2007-03-22 05:33:25 · answer #1 · answered by Spacephantom 7 · 3 4

While I do not support they BNP, it seems they are increasing their support because of the kinds of misrepresentations expressed by the Question.

One reason is the growing opposition in the UK amongst all races to the country being over full is due in part to the expansion of the EU to give citizens of former Soviet Bloc countries like Poland, Roumania and Czech republic to be able to come into Britain and take our jobs. These unwanted new immigrants are WHITE not black, and they are disliked by black native Britons and British Islamic Asians as much as by whites? The result is both the BNP and UKIP are likely to get a lot more votes from people who are utterly fed up with the policies of Blair and those of the Conservatives and Lib-Dems in supporting this unwanted increase in immigration and doing nothing to stop illegal immigration.

The BNP's prospects have been further enhanced by the idiotic decision of the government to try to convict Nick Griffin for saying the Islam is "a wicked religion", because a very high percentage of UK voters including many Afro-Caribbeans agree with Nick Griffin's opinion on that, and also believe that the ancient right of "freedom of speech" must never be removed, as we won WW2 and won the "cold war" because we British, regardless of race, colour or religion, cherish this right so strongly.. . .

2007-03-27 06:17:32 · answer #2 · answered by cimex 5 · 2 0

I'm sorry you do not support the BNP, but your information is well out of date. Nick Griffin has got rid of the racialist element of the party and has formed a party with a future. I have been closely monitoring both BNP and UKIP and both parties are ready for a role in British politics. To long have the mainstream parties controlled middle of the road voters and traditional tribal voters of both Labour, Conservative and Liberal parties have finally had enough of being lead by what amounts to a dictatorship and a one party state.

New Labour are a communist party that are corrupt and bent on setting up a police state and the removal of our basic freedoms. New Labours policies deviate little from the Conservatives or the Liberals so there is no diversity. No diversity equals one party state. New labour are the new third Reich promoting ethnic cleansing. Both BNP and UKIP recognise there is a major problem with immigration and also recognise the indigenous Britain's Right to exist. All of us recognise the right of the Jewish community to exist please explain why you or anyone else would not recognise the indigenous Britain's right to also exist? Is it that you yourself are in fact a racialist or a reverse racialist (someone against his/her own people). Reverse racialism is no better than any other type of racialism and should be left where it belongs in the gutter.
The BNP are putting up candadates from the Indian community and the Jewish community and as far as I am aware no one is banned from joining.
It is essential that both the BNP and UKIP get as many seats as possible. If the communist party get back in with a vast majority all hope of a free Britain will vanish. Political diversity is essential to our contries way forward

2007-03-21 09:15:18 · answer #3 · answered by Redmonk 6 · 4 4

Well if I listen to all you have said about the BNP there's not a lot of choice left to answer your question is there. I will wait and see before making any decision regarding the BNP.

2007-03-21 17:29:39 · answer #4 · answered by cassidy 4 · 2 1

I actually voted BNP in the last general election, as a protest vote to the government.

I agree with some of thier views but not all of them. Because this country is becoming so PC (politcally Correct) Its stands a good chance of losing its identity. I aleady think we are living in a dictatorship.

Just a take at look at this country its almost lawless, parents and teachers not being able to discipline their kids, the gun crime, and knife crime is at an alltime high, the police are not allowed to question ethnic minorities, incase they get sued for being racist.

They let all and sundry into the country god knows how illegal immigrants there are in this county they have lost count, and they let radical muslims preach hatred without batting an eyelid. It has to stop.

2007-03-21 13:08:04 · answer #5 · answered by phil 6 · 6 4

nice bit of info - just goes to show how racist and fascist like they are.
one answer here called New Labour - communist - doesn't that go to show that the supporters of the BNP are fascists and very confused, and racist... i could go on...
What is wrong with communism? - you would think that a party for the working classes would support it - but no...
the BNP will no win a seat, like always... thank Christ - under FPTP a vote for a BNP candidate is simply a wasted one - so NO LUCK TO THE BNP U ********

2007-03-27 15:12:26 · answer #6 · answered by Soylent 4 · 1 2

I don't like the BNP and am aware of their underlying policies, but well done to you for putting so much info on here. The more people who currently tend to vote for them as a protest vote, who get to realise just what they stand for the better.

2007-03-27 06:25:10 · answer #7 · answered by noeusuperstate 6 · 1 2

Mind you, if they had an 'all idiots out of the Country' policy, then the BNP would be operating from the Isle of Man.

2007-03-27 08:25:34 · answer #8 · answered by manforallseasons 4 · 1 2

Well lets hope when they get in power they hold to everything said! Lets see some support out on the streets with some kickings for the ones who clearly aren't British and don't belong! Oi!

2007-03-26 07:20:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

You ought to try walking through certain areas on your own night or day and then try saying that the communities who refuse to integrate into OUR way of life aren't a problem. Put your money where your mouth is and give it a go.

2007-03-22 10:54:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

fedest.com, questions and answers