To me it just plugs a gap before Life On Mars.
2007-03-20 22:12:32 · 7 answers · asked by Dustbowl Blues 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
It's pretty lame really, but I've got a worry that it's going to make people more obsessed with not just their own image, but their poor old dog's as well!! There's something a bit wrong about judging rescue dogs on performance, surely dogs should be appreciated just for being dogs!! I'm a cat person myself and would go proper bonkers if they started doing anything like that with cats. It reminds me slightly of those shows in the old days where they used to dress animals up and were basically pretty cruel.
2007-03-21 03:00:16 · answer #1 · answered by Princess Paradox 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is a poor excuse filler really. A group of poor celebs showing off. I know it again adds to Children in Need and shows off what rescue dogs can do. But I rather the Money went to the Dog Shelter or another Animal Charity!
And Julian to Present? Oh dear.
2007-03-21 00:51:09 · answer #2 · answered by Kevan M 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I did enjoy it cos I'm a dog person but it did disturb me that these rescue dogs are still up for adoption after the show. I think the suggestion of the proceeds going to Dog charity is much better than Children in Need.
2007-03-21 04:10:20 · answer #3 · answered by Sharon B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
various what's written interior the precise answer must be precise yet once you think of Europeans taken care of black slaves worse than white slaves, i.e in case you do not think of 'mutilation, rape, attack, famine' have been subjected upon different Europeans via Europeans than you're very wrong. purely take a glance in recent background at how the Germans have been taken care of after their defeat in WW2. Boys have been tortured and a few performed via being run over with tanks on an identical time as ladies of each age have been raped in mass via Russians and Yugoslavians. on each occasion a team, despite their race, loses a conflict to a distinctive team anticipate the worst aspects of human nature to return out.
2016-10-19 05:52:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
More cheap TV. its Bl--dy allful
2007-03-20 22:17:10 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
more cheap telly, in my opinion there wasn't one good thing on terrestial tv
2007-03-20 22:25:50 · answer #6 · answered by bushmonkeyman 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
waste!!!
2007-03-21 01:27:53 · answer #7 · answered by sholii 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋