All of us agree that Sree is imp. for our campaign but what if the team does'nt play him at all. It will surely be a waste of talent but I am really concerned for Sree coz he's the only man who can take the team out of trouble in sticky situations.
2007-03-20 21:31:44 · 16 answers · asked by priyam_978 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
His being in the playing eleven depends on how munaf, ajit and zaheer bowl. He will get a chance only if any of the above plays miserably. He has to wait. The worrying factor for him is his net run rate. he gives too many runs, but always gets breakthrough. So it is a tricky question whether to include him or not.
http://www.cricket.indhp.net
2007-03-20 21:40:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually this should be the happiest moment s for the players who really have not been included in the squad. Being a member in a team performed against Bengladesh is really shameful. So why you need Kumble Sreesanth & Karthik in this suicide squad, all three could have been included in the playing XI if any other management or a practical captain is deciding things.
Being the first match and 2 points are more important out of form batsman Sehwag was sent for an opener doesnt make any sense except somebody's interest.
Saheer-Sreesanth is the best opening bowling combination for India after a long gap could be well supported by Kumble & Munaf. See how simply they spoiled everthing and act like superstitious after a win over Bermuda - perform just like a school team...
2007-03-22 04:12:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
So what? If Sree does not play, India has fat chances of winning ;-) You seem to be an obsessive fan supporting this guy purely out of regional affiliation. If he does not play, it is only because on any day, to win the cup, we have to field the best 11 and at this time he doesn't fit into the scheme of things. Trying to look up when in the world he took the team out of trouble in sticky situation :-)
2007-03-21 05:17:14 · answer #3 · answered by surnell 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sree has the ability to pick wickets when needed , but he also gives away many runs .. but zaheer , munaf and ajith are more economical compared to sree .. so it ll be better if these 3 bowlers perform well and sree stays in the dressing room
2007-03-21 07:09:00 · answer #4 · answered by Neo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dnt think Sree is d player to b in d team, cz his economy rate is too high.
2007-03-21 13:09:32 · answer #5 · answered by ankit_uppal 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is an amaging bowler with less experiece compare to Zaheer,Agarkar. Zaheer's bowling can say ok but Agarkar such an experieced player not delivering as per team requirements. Agarkar is not a match winner. Munaf bowls well. Lets see what Rahul think tank ...?
2007-03-21 07:36:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope that is highly unlikely lookin at the way how agarkar has been bowling.Sreesanth may shed some extra runs but he s definitely more aggressive and has genuine pace and is a real wicket taker who can win matches for India.
2007-03-21 05:14:48 · answer #7 · answered by Ganesen Viswanathan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know about sree . Facing Sri Lanka on Friday is crutial.
2007-03-21 04:53:32 · answer #8 · answered by Dilantha2 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
after the royal drubbing we got from Bangladesh, Sree must be glad he is excluded from such an idiotic combination!( cant even call it a team )
2007-03-21 04:42:18 · answer #9 · answered by JDGuru at work 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bad luck 4 us. as he's e one who can take wkts..big ones ask lara,kallis..Not tail like agarkar .. he can be a allrounder as well,,who can forget his big hit against nel..?
so they better bring him for lanka as without him can't take wkts as even e bermudans batted for around 40 overs..
so quick bring on sree,,e most aggressive indian bowler.
2007-03-21 04:42:07 · answer #10 · answered by MaVeRiCk 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋