English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-20 19:09:34 · 7 answers · asked by ibid 3 in Politics & Government Politics

Sexuality has a biological basis, whether you accept it or not, it is a fact and the principle concept into understanding not just the psyche but primitive base necessities we're all born with


http://www.christianpost.com/article/20070314/26330_Furor_Over_Baptist's_Gay-Baby_Article.htm

2007-03-20 19:28:21 · update #1

7 answers

I think it is unethical, and sets a scary precedent. What's next, designer babies that are completely without "flaws"...then there will be a super-race of humans. Think about the discrimination that will arise then...there will be two classes of humans. The "perfects" will enslave the "naturals". Maybe I watch too many sci-fi movies, but the implications are real.

2007-03-20 19:18:03 · answer #1 · answered by ♥austingirl♥ 6 · 0 0

You are making quite an assumption there. The last I heard there was no real proof for a biological basis.
But...I will, for the sake of argument give you that...and no, It would not be wrong to do that because homosexuality is aberrant behavior. Women and men have different parts that actually fit together for a purpose.

2007-03-20 19:38:06 · answer #2 · answered by mamadixie 7 · 0 0

We don't know for certain, "Nature," or "Nuture" If homosexuality could be eliminated by some kind of treatment of the fetus, it would be a major social experiment. I could name a good number of gay people who have been important in the arts, music, scholership, even science and the military. Would these people have shown the same brillance if they had been 'streight'? Nobody knows. Society would be different without gay people, but would it be better? Again, nobody knows, and better by who's deffinetion?

2007-03-21 12:52:40 · answer #3 · answered by Lyle G 3 · 0 0

Well the problem with that is that there is no biological basis for homosexuality, its completely a learned behavior.

2007-03-20 19:24:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

circumcision was partly designed to reduce masturbation.If we designed sexuality in any direction at all, the extremists would just try to reverse the direction.

2007-03-20 20:34:36 · answer #5 · answered by stratoframe 5 · 0 0

That would be kinda hard.. brain surgery is not that advanced yet...

probably in the future.. but i suppose noone will want to do it. no reason to. it's legal anywayz.

2007-03-20 19:13:07 · answer #6 · answered by gabriell_021 2 · 0 0

LINK PLEASE

2007-03-20 19:23:24 · answer #7 · answered by Unfrozen Caveman 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers