English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I was taught that they did not define revolution as a violent overthrowing, but meant it as revolving, that is, a revolution back to their rights as Englishmen. That was decades ago, and since then I've never found a similar teaching. So, what did they really mean by "revolution"?

Thanks!

Fred

2007-03-20 18:34:42 · 2 answers · asked by Fred Sinder 1 in Arts & Humanities History

2 answers

~No, they had no intention of engaging in violence. That is why the minute men practiced with slingshots and feather dusters and the shooting war lasted for only 6 years. What they had hoped was that King George would set up a local government with revolving governors in each colony, who would be answerable to the crown but otherwise have no authority.

2007-03-20 18:50:38 · answer #1 · answered by Oscar Himpflewitz 7 · 1 0

A new way. A new way of governing. A new tax system. A new set of laws. A new way of life in general. Don't forget about getting rid of the monarchy. The people wanted to rule themselves, have a say about their lives.

Listen to "Revolution," by the Beatles. "So you say you want a revolution, well ya know, we all wanna hear the plan." "We'd all love to change the world."

2007-03-21 02:27:42 · answer #2 · answered by shell 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers