English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

YES!!! I can't think of anything conservative that he has done. He hasn't vetoed any bill which has mushroomed our federal discretionary spending. "No Child Left Behind" is a joke. The Transportation Bill was a joke. When George Bush is talking, he says he's conservative; yet, when it comes to spending your money, he is no different from Ted Kennedy or Henry Waxman.

I think he handled the initial phase of the War on Terror very well and he did the right thing nominating Roberts and Alito to the Supreme Court.

2007-03-20 18:20:53 · answer #1 · answered by Jesus Jones 4 · 0 0

The President of the United States is not the King but a simple (very simple) elected offical. Period.

He serves primarily for: balance of power between branches, a symbol of the US in dealing in foreign affaris, and to implement protective measures (war and defense) for the entire land.

As such, he has failed miserably to inhibit an incomprehensible flow of illegals over the border--some who may or may not intend to do harm to the legal citizens. He also has fought a disorganized expensive war that has far-reaching aspirations and continued implementation problems--such as allowing civilian lawmakers to decide how the military should do their job (I do not discuss the legitimacy of the war, just the handling of it).

Everything else we should blame on Congress--BOTH parties.

If we as a people can distance ourselves from the false notion that the President is legislative, and Congress is executive, then we might return to a coherent rule of law that once made the US great.

Until then, I guess everyone can continue to watch reality TV, and eat bonbons.

2007-03-21 05:32:40 · answer #2 · answered by firehorsegirl 2 · 0 0

Yes
Things have been quite interesting on C-SPAN.
They've had conservatives such as Ron Paul, Bob Barr, Bruce Fein, Richard Viguerie, and David Keene speak out against the unethical and illegal actions of our government. There is a forum / message board for those AMERICAN CITIZENS who would like to Speak Out. The site has also mentioned Tom Tancredo, immigration, religious rights, etc. I'll be there when I can. God Bless America...One Nation Under God
http://www.conservativehq.com

2007-03-20 18:48:41 · answer #3 · answered by American Citizen 2 · 0 0

the finest Goldwater/Reagan conservative, Pat Buchanan, replaced into so annoyed with Bush's neoconservative agenda that he felt that he had to leave the get at the same time. straight away from Pat's information superhighway website: "united states is being bankrupted by ability of a bloated federal forms that now squanders more beneficial of our tax funds than at any aspect in our united states's historic previous. we are an over- regulated, over-taxed, and over-ruled society. very last year, fifty 3 federal agencies and 127,000 federal workers spent over $17 billion of our tax funds writing and imposing federal regulations. that's time to end this regulatory reign of terror by ability of final inefficient agencies, restructuring federal departments, and making the funds procedure more beneficial accountable." "at the same time as the Republican get at the same time at present controls the White homestead and Congress, how stands conservatism, making use of Reagan-Helms because the optimal? On tax cuts, a sturdy nationwide protection and the nomination of federal judges who have self assurance united states is a republic the position the human beings rule by elected representatives, no longer a judicial dictatorship, George W. Bush meets the optimal. yet on spending, Bush and Congress do no longer even meet the Clinton usual. They qualify as tremendous Society Conservatives. The Republican Revolution of 1994 became out like that vaunted leading edge we released after Sputnik that were given 4 feet off the floor. " And sure, even this: "as a outcome on loose commerce, immigration and the conflict, all major topics, conservatism is a house divided. John McCain and Rudy Giuliani, the optimal applicants to prevail Bush, stand with him on all 3, in spite of the undeniable fact that the country stands adverse to all 3, on all 3 topics. The very last best desire of the GOP in 2008 is – as always – the Democrats." playstation -- Whoever gave me a thumbs-down ought to no longer be a real conservative, then.

2016-12-02 08:16:45 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Here is a new book by a true conservative

The Conservative Soul
How We Lost It, How to Get It Back

By Andrew Sullivan

2007-03-20 18:13:42 · answer #5 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 2 0

In several ways, yes. He'd have done a lot better with Osama's head on a stick, instead of going after Saddam, and actually developing alternative fuels to tell OPEC to stuff it.

These are examples.

On the plus side, he's proven we won't take crap from anyone. At least that's what going into Afghanistan proved.

2007-03-20 18:16:24 · answer #6 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 0 1

The GOP "grand old party"was HiJacked by the neocons!SAD THE WAY THEY FOOOOLLLED ALOT OF GOOD CONSERVATIVE FOLK !Now it should break away and call themselves the GNP"grand neo party"!

2007-03-20 18:58:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

on some issues he has. but he sure is spending alot and the whole immigration thing is out of control!! I just don't see how you can fight a war on terror, but have open borders!!

2007-03-20 18:59:51 · answer #8 · answered by aaron b 4 · 0 0

He hasn't been remotely tough on illegal immigration, and he tends to spend money at various times like a drunken sailor.

2007-03-20 18:29:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I would hope the words our Attorney General are alarming most of them.

2007-03-20 18:16:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers