2007-03-20 16:23:22 · 11 answers · asked by The Zunester 5 in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
no cause if the expected is unexpected then it can not really be expected. you should expected everything, but you can never really expect what is unexpected because...it is unexpected.
2007-03-20 16:26:48 · answer #1 · answered by rachaelrappleye 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I suspect it does, in the same way that suspecting the unsuspected "expecting of the unexpected" making the "unexpected expected" would make that unsuspected "expecting" suspected!
I think I have a brain freeze coming on!
2007-03-20 23:49:41 · answer #2 · answered by jaded 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the expected becomes unexpected because the unexpected is taking up the expecting ... its just one big ol cycle
2007-03-20 23:27:36 · answer #3 · answered by may 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because the unexpected is always unexpected
2007-03-20 23:30:54 · answer #4 · answered by Daft 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not if the unexpected was not what you expected to happen
2007-03-20 23:27:38 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeppers it does don't it
But still doesn't allow for the specifics of the "unexpected" does it?
2007-03-20 23:28:17 · answer #6 · answered by Tadow 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah. people who didn't like unexpected things coined that phrase. they didn't like risks.
boring *** people
2007-03-21 05:52:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's definitely paradoxical. If you really want to twist your brain around think about this paradox:
This statement is false.
If it's false it means it's actually true which means it is false and on and on....
2007-03-21 02:32:25 · answer #8 · answered by theegorider 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no-o-o..... it means not to anticipate anything, because anything is possible.
-or- "should we agree to disagree, then disagree some more" :)
2007-03-21 17:49:29 · answer #9 · answered by wholenote4 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
absolutely.
2007-03-20 23:30:21 · answer #10 · answered by Michael A 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋