English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-20 15:21:59 · 17 answers · asked by FOX NEWS WATCHER 1 in Politics & Government Politics

17 answers

He is the reciprocal of your question.

2007-03-20 15:29:03 · answer #1 · answered by I socket 2 · 2 0

Do I detect a ironic question here?

The Constitution and Bill of Rights can get in the way of the velvet enslavement of a compliant population.

I'm sure that GWB will live up to the same standards set by the Patriot Act and its sequel. I think congress deserves some credit here.

2007-03-20 22:30:46 · answer #2 · answered by Skeptic 7 · 3 0

Hmmm... Let's see. The constitution was supposed to protect the PEOPLE AND COUNTRY from despots and tyrants in the age of kings and others in power. It set ground rules for basic tenets of laws and protections for the people.
It limited the power of government. Todays perception of government is to care for all people from cradle to grave and WE DO NOT WANT TO TURN INTO FRANCE! They have no job growth. High regulations. 35 hour work weeks. lots of holiday time.(4 to 6 weeks vacation) Can't fire people who don't perform well. Riots in the streets, when suggesting some of these things are considerd for remediation or change. The people don't want their RIGHTS taken away. Not to allow ONE judge to change the laws of the land when laws are supposed to be created by the Congress.

2007-03-20 22:41:12 · answer #3 · answered by michael h 1 · 2 1

Since when has George W. Bush been a defender of the Constitution? To him it is only a GD piece of paper.

2007-03-20 22:27:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

Bush is an ardent dismantler of the Constitution. Read about it in a book.

2007-03-20 22:26:09 · answer #5 · answered by ToYou,Too! 5 · 7 3

The decider is a wanna-be destroyer of the US Constitution. The serious question is do we let that happen?

2007-03-20 22:32:29 · answer #6 · answered by teetzijo 3 · 3 0

He really is whether you like him or not. And,
shouldn't every president be an ardent defender
of the Constitution? They pledge it when they
are sworn into office.

2007-03-20 22:33:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

It is in the Presidential Oath of Office - to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

2007-03-20 22:25:19 · answer #8 · answered by Leah 6 · 2 3

Bush and his administration has tried to usurp the Constitution at every chance they get.

2007-03-20 22:27:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 7 2

Cause he believes a good constitution is important in everyone's life. That's why he eats so much fiber.

2007-03-20 22:25:55 · answer #10 · answered by Overt Operative 6 · 6 3

fedest.com, questions and answers